Uncategorized
Filter
Showing 13–20 of 20 results
- UAE-based prop firm (Prime Tech Group FZE LLC, Dubai) with simulated forex/CFD challenges on Match Trader
- Signature feature: “PTG Flexible” build-your-own challenge plus 50+ fixed combinations
- Tiered split ~75% Basic to 85% Premium/Instant — higher splits mean a pricier tier
- The catch: “real money” marketing vs Terms calling the funds “fictitious” and simulated
- One-time fee, no monthly subscription; note the payout schedule is not clearly published
★★★★★
More details +PTG Funded
PTG Funded appeal is real for the right trader: an unusually configurable line-up, a genuine build-your-own challenge, aggressive instant scaling, and one-time fees with no subscription. Set expectations by the Terms, not the homepage: the accounts are simulated with fictitious funds despite the real-money marketing, the up-to-80% split is a mid-tier ceiling you pay to reach, and the payout schedule is not clearly published. Resolve that in writing before buying.PROS:
- Unusually configurable: 50+ fixed combinations plus a PTG Flexible build-your-own challenge|Aggressive instant scaling advertised to double every 10% profit|One-time fee per challenge, no monthly subscription|Broad range of account sizes ($2,500 to $100,000) and evaluation types|Reasonable drawdown flexibility across plans
CONS:
- Real-capital and real-money marketing contradicts Terms calling the funds fictitious and simulated|No clearly published payout schedule (amount, frequency, first-payout timing)|Higher splits require buying the pricier tier; up-to-80% is a mid-tier ceiling|Unregulated UAE free-zone entity; US residents excluded|Live site was bot-blocked during research; some figures reflect recent captures
- Appears CLOSED / defunct — trackers list it CLOSED with a do-not-send-funds warning; traders report accounts wiped on shutdown
- Was a UK-registered (R1 London Ltd) simulated forex/CFD firm on cTrader, founded late 2024 by an ex-Saxo Bank front-office head
- Distinctive: an anti-scalping, low-leverage philosophy (banned scalping/HFT/grid; 1:50 leverage) — which became a payout gate
- Historical: 1-step & 2-step, 80% split, on-demand payouts ($150 min); did not accept US traders
- Kept online as a caution. If you are owed money, treat it as a loss and report it. No CTA
★★★★★
More details +R U The 1
R U The 1 appears to be closed. Independent prop-firm trackers list it as CLOSED with a do-not-send-funds warning, its website no longer serves a working product, and traders have reported being told the firm was shutting down and that they would lose their accounts, so everything else is historical. It was a UK-registered simulated forex and CFD prop firm operated by R1 London Ltd, founded in December 2024 by a former Saxo Bank front-office head, trading on cTrader. Its defining trait was an anti-scalping, low-leverage philosophy that banned scalping, HFT and grid trading and capped leverage at 1:50, which also became a payout-dispute gate. It did not accept US traders. There is nothing to recommend: do not buy a challenge or deposit money, and if you are owed a payout, treat it as a loss and report it.PROS:
- No current advantages: the firm appears closed and warns do-not-send-funds
CONS:
- Appears closed: trackers list CLOSED with a do-not-send-funds warning|Traders report accounts wiped on shutdown|Unregulated and simulated; UK registration is not financial regulation|Anti-scalping rule used as a discretionary payout gate|Did not accept US traders
- CLOSED: the firm is no longer operating. Do not buy a challenge here.
- Multi-asset prop firm (Rocket 21 Challenge, US) on DX Trade via Eightcap; simulated/virtual accounts
- 85% base split, up to 90% — but on Apollo 11 the 90% is a paid add-on
- Signature model: à-la-carte Apollo 11 — pay individually for split, drawdown, weekly payouts, early withdrawal
- Apollo 11 refunds the challenge fee on first withdrawal; failed 2-step can be “Revived”
- Caution: independent reviews report slow/delayed payouts and a rough 2025 US migration
★★★★★
More details +Rocket 21
Rocket 21 a-la-carte pricing is genuinely novel: you buy exactly the drawdown room, split, payout cadence and early-withdrawal rights you want, the challenge fee comes back on your first withdrawal, and a failed two-step can be revived. The reservations are real: the accounts are simulated, the attractive terms are paid extras rather than the advertised base, and independent reports on payout speed put its reliability below the sector best.PROS:
- A-la-carte Apollo 11: pay only for the terms you actually need|Challenge fee refunded on your first withdrawal (Apollo 11)|Failed two-step accounts can be Revived rather than repurchased|Broad multi-asset range (forex, indices, metals, oil, crypto) with scaling to $2m|One-time fee, no monthly subscription
CONS:
- Independent reviews report slow or delayed payouts, waits of weeks in some cases|Rough early-2025 US platform migration locked some clients out for weeks|Accounts are simulated/virtual, not real capital|The 90% split, weekly payouts and early withdrawal are paid add-ons, not the base|Unregulated; exact legal entity not stated on public pages
- Prop business CLOSED (~Feb 2026) — accounts shut, pivoted to a CFD broker. Do not buy a challenge
- Was the rebrand of MyFundedFX — an unregulated, simulated forex/CFD evaluation firm (HK/Cyprus) on MT5/cTrader/MatchTrader/DXTrade
- Distinctive: a 15% consistency rule that delayed payouts (not breached the account) until your biggest day fell below ~20% of profit
- 80% split (90% via paid VIP); frequent trailing-drawdown-disable and consistency-gated-payout complaints
- Kept online as a caution. If you are owed money, follow the refund process and keep records
★★★★★
More details +Seacrest Funded
There is no live recommendation: Seacrest Funded prop business is closed (around Feb 2026, pivoted to a CFD broker), and even before the shutdown its payouts were gated by a consistency rule and its 1-step trailing drawdown drew frequent complaints. Do not buy a challenge. As a lesson, a large popular brand (MyFundedFX had thousands of reviews) can exit the prop business at short notice, and payout-gating rules, where you stay funded but cannot withdraw, are worth scrutinising closely.PROS:
- None as a prop firm - the division is closed
- Kept online here only as a documented notice
- Serves as a cautionary example of payout-gating consistency rules
- If you are owed money, the review explains the refund process
- A reminder that even large, popular brands can exit prop at short notice
CONS:
- Prop division closed around February 2026; pivoted to a CFD brokerage
- Refund process excluded breached, inactive and giveaway accounts
- Reports of denied or delayed final payouts during the wind-down
- CLOSED / defunct — verified website is a blank placeholder; brand wound down
- Was a simulated forex/CFD firm (1-step & 2-step) on MT4/MT5/ThinkTrader/Match-Trader
- Defining trait: a serial-rebranding chain — Bespoke Funding → The Prop Vault → House of Leverage
- Red flag: predecessor Bespoke Funding carried a UK FCA warning; final brand shut down in 2025 with payout disputes open
- Kept online as a caution. If you are owed money, treat it as a loss and report it. No CTA
★★★★★
More details +The Prop Vault
The Prop Vault appears to be closed. Its website now loads only a blank placeholder and the brand has been wound down, so everything else is historical. It was one identity in a serial-rebranding chain run by the same operator, from Bespoke Funding Program to The Prop Vault to House of Leverage, with repeated broker and server migrations. The predecessor, Bespoke Funding, carried a UK FCA warning, and the final brand, House of Leverage, reportedly told customers it was shutting down in August 2025 with payout disputes unresolved. Historically it was an unregulated, simulated forex and CFD firm offering 1-step and 2-step challenges. There is nothing to recommend: do not buy a challenge or deposit money, and if you are owed a payout, treat it as a loss and report it.PROS:
- No current advantages: the brand is closed and its site is a placeholder
CONS:
- Appears closed: website is a blank placeholder and the brand is wound down|Serial-rebranding chain: Bespoke Funding to The Prop Vault to House of Leverage|Predecessor Bespoke Funding carried a UK FCA warning|Final brand shut down in 2025 with payout disputes open|Traders reported passing then being denied payouts
- Apparently not selling accounts at time of writing — all plans show “Coming soon”; reportedly lost its platforms in early 2026
- Isle of Man-registered simulated futures prop firm (TickTickTrader Ltd) on US futures markets
- Distinctive: a rare in-person footprint — physical trading floors and a live Abu Dhabi trading competition
- Reported terms (unverified): keep 100% of profits ~3 months then 90/10; $250 min withdrawal
- Unusual recurring monthly subscription ($145–$285/mo). Do not buy until it demonstrably resumes
★★★★★
More details +TickTickTrader
TickTickTrader was a distinctive firm: a simulated US-futures evaluation with an unusually strong in-person, MENA-and-Europe events presence that nothing else in the space quite matched. But the honest assessment today is simple: it does not appear to be operating normally. Its own site sells nothing, and it reportedly lost the trading platforms a futures firm cannot function without. Until there is confirmed evidence of stable operation, do not buy an evaluation from it.PROS:
- Rare in-person footprint: physical trading floors and a live Abu Dhabi trading competition
- Strong community identity across MENA and Europe
- Reported (unverified) keep-100%-for-~3-months window on performance accounts
- Focused purely on regulated US futures markets
- Clear simulated-account disclosure in its own terms
CONS:
- Appears to have suspended sales: all plans show Coming soon
- Reportedly lost its trading platforms in early 2026 (Tradovate, then ProjectX)
- Allegations of unpaid platform-data bills
- Appears CLOSED / wound down — site returns an error; a 2026 tracker warns “do not send funds.” Do not buy
- Malta prop firm (Traddoo LTD) that ran simulated forex/CFD via FunderPro, then tried a futures pivot after that partnership ended (late 2024)
- Distinctive (historical): fee refunded only on the 4th payout, plus a “hedging trap” (disqualified for hedging after passing)
- 80% split; crypto-only (USDT) payouts; drawdown described inconsistently (static vs equity-based)
- Kept online as a caution. If you are owed money, treat it as a payout dispute and report it
★★★★★
More details +Traddoo
There is nothing to recommend: Traddoo appears to be closed or wound down, its site does not load, and an independent tracker warns against sending it funds. Do not buy a challenge or deposit money. Even before the closure signals, Traddoo carried warning signs worth learning from: a fee refund deferred to the 4th payout, a hedging trap where marketed freedoms became grounds for disqualification, internally inconsistent rules, and a fragile dependence on a single broker partner that ended.PROS:
- None - the firm appears to be closed or wound down|Kept online here only as a documented warning|Serves as a cautionary example of retroactive disqualifications and single-partner dependence|If you are owed money, the review explains how to report it|A reminder to avoid firms with contradictory terms and hedging traps
CONS:
- Appears closed: website returns an error; a 2026 tracker warns do not send funds|Lost its FunderPro broker partnership in late 2024, forcing a forex exit|Hedging trap: accounts marketed as allowing hedging were disqualified for hedging|Fee refunded only on the 4th payout; crypto-only payouts|Internally inconsistent rules (drawdown described as both static and equity-based)
- Appears CLOSED / defunct — verified site returns an error; a tracker warns “do not send funds”; weeks-long outage reported. Do not buy
- Was a Hong Kong prop firm (Traders With Edge Limited), execution via broker Eightcap, on Match Trader/DX Trade; $2,500–$1m
- Headline: an aggressive $30 million scaling ceiling for long-term consistent traders
- The catch: a paid-add-on model — the 80% split and 1:100 leverage were upgrades, not the default; instant funding paid ~50%
- Kept online as a caution. If you are owed money, treat it as a loss and report it
★★★★★
More details +Traders with Edge
Traders With Edge appears to be closed or non-operational: its website returns an error, an independent tracker warns against sending it funds, and traders report a five-plus-week platform outage with accounts cancelled and no support. Historically it was an unregulated Hong Kong prop firm (execution via broker Eightcap) whose headline was an aggressive 30 million dollar scaling ceiling, undercut by a pay-to-unlock model where the 80% split and 1:100 leverage were paid upgrades. There is nothing to recommend today. Do not buy a challenge or deposit money; if you are owed a payout, keep records and report it. Score reflects apparent closure and payout failure.PROS:
- Historically offered a very high 30 million dollar scaling ceiling for consistent traders|Wide instrument range and multiple platforms (Match Trader, DX Trade)|Execution routed through an ASIC-regulated broker (Eightcap)
CONS:
- Appears closed: website down and tracker warns do not send funds|Traders report weeks-long outage, cancelled accounts and no support|Unregulated firm; pay-to-unlock model where 80% split and 1:100 leverage were paid add-ons|Instant funding paid only about 50%|Headline 30 million ceiling was effectively marketing, far out of reach