Prop Firm Offering 1 Million Dollars Funding
Updated
“$1 million in funding” can mean a single account, several permitted accounts added together or a ceiling available only after a long scaling process. Those routes require different purchases and different evidence. This page focuses on how a trader could actually reach a seven-figure allocation, rather than treating every million-dollar headline as an account available today.
The comparison distinguishes the starting account size, the maximum combined allocation and any performance-based growth route. A nominal balance may be simulated, and it is not money the trader owns or can withdraw. The separate loss allowance determines how much adverse movement the programme permits.
Start by asking whether the million-dollar figure is available at entry, after evaluations, through aggregation or only after scaling. Then check whether the firm’s overall trader cap supports that route. Buying several accounts does not establish permission to combine their allocations, trade them identically or withdraw the advertised total. The practical question is which documented steps lead to usable access and what limits apply along the way.
Filter
Showing 1–12 of 35 results
- US-registered prop firm (Alpha Lab Technologies LTD, Wyoming; alphafunded.com) with simulated forex/CFD challenges
- Signature rules: a per-trade floating-loss cap (auto-close) plus mandatory profitable days (7 or 10)
- Split marketed “up to 100%” but really 90% — and faster payouts lower it (~80% / ~70%)
- Simulated Terms under “real capital / up to $4M” marketing; news/weekend/fast payouts are paid add-ons
- Distinct from the UK firm Alpha Capital Group; some payout-denial complaints on record
★★★★★
More details +Alpha Trader Firm
Alpha Trader Firm is a legitimately US-registered, transparently-disclosed simulated firm with a broad product range and modern platforms. For a trader with tight per-trade risk and frequent small profits, its rules are passable and its 90% funded split is competitive. But it is demanding and add-on-gated, and the marketing oversells it: the per-trade floating-loss cap can end an account on a single temporary drawdown, the profitable-days rule punishes patient styles, and the 100% split is really 90% (less for fast payouts).PROS:
- Legitimately US-registered with an unusually clear simulated-account disclosure
- Broad product range (1-step, 2-step, instant, pay-later) and modern platforms
- 90% default funded split is competitive
- One-time fee, no monthly subscription
- Payouts via RISE with the firm covering fees
CONS:
- Per-trade floating-loss cap auto-closes the account, even on a temporary drawdown
- Mandatory profitable days (7 or 10 per 30) penalise patient or low-frequency styles
- 100% split is really 90%, and faster payouts lower it (~80% / ~70%)
- CFD evaluations and Instant models on simulated capital; rules vary by product and purchase date
- 90% standard profit share; optional 100% add-on and risk penalties apply
- New Instant Standard: 1% floating-loss strike system; Instant Flex and Pay After Pass: 1% hard breach
- Static and trailing drawdown options; consistency and qualifying days vary
- 3% payout processing fee; evaluation fee refunded at the fourth successful payout
★★★★★
More details +Aqua Funded
AquaFunded offers CFD evaluations and Instant models on simulated capital. Rules differ materially by model and purchase date: the new Instant Standard has a 1% floating-loss strike system, while Instant Flex and Pay After Pass use a 1% hard breach. Static options include One Step Flex as well as Two Step Standard/Elite and Three Step. The standard share is 90%, but processing fees, risk penalties, consistency gates and reward caps affect withdrawals. The evaluation fee refund requires four successful payouts.PROS:
- 90% standard profit share
- Multiple CFD model choices
- Static maximum drawdown available on four listed models
- No evaluation completion deadline, subject to activity rules
- MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader and TradeLocker
- Published scaling pathway subject to approval
CONS:
- Floating-loss limits can cut reward shares or breach an account
- Consistency and profitable-day gates vary by model and purchase date
- 3% payout processing fee
- Initial payout caps on $100K+ accounts; Instant Flex recurring cap
- Evaluation refund requires the fourth successful payout
- Some general help wording differs from product-specific rules
- Simulated prop firm trading since 2012, one of the longest records in the category. Three programmes on MT5 and DXTrade, $5,000 to $200,000. Contracting entity AudaCity Global LTD, licensed in the Union of Comoros.
- The loosest rules on this site: the two-step allows 7.5% daily loss and 15% maximum in phase 1, static and measured on initial balance. No time limit on any evaluation.
- News trading, weekend holding, expert advisors and copy trading all permitted on every programme.
- Avoid FTP: instant funding costs $1,299 at $50K against $329 for the two-step, pays a lower split, and still imposes a 10% profit target.
- Watch: the site says no consistency rule while the terms still carry an active consistency clause; the advertised 90% split is shown as 85% or 75% in the firm own calculator; and the Trustpilot rating is unavailable on Trustpilot’s official website.
★★★★★
More details +AudaCity Capital
AudaCity Capital has been trading since 2012, one of the longest records in this category. It sells three programmes on MetaTrader 5 and DXTrade, from 5,000 to 200,000 dollars. The contracting entity is AudaCity Global LTD, registration 15850, operating under an International Brokerage and Clearing House Licence issued by the Union of Comoros, with a London office and a Cyprus payment partner. That licence is real, which puts it ahead of rivals holding none, but it is a light-touch offshore regime rather than a major-market regulator. Its strongest feature is drawdown room: phase one of the Ability Challenge allows a 7.5 percent daily loss and a 15 percent maximum, static and measured on the initial balance, with no time limit and news trading, weekend holding, expert advisors and copy trading all permitted. Three cautions. FTP, the instant funding route, costs 1,299 dollars at 50,000 against 329 for the two-step, pays a lower split and still imposes a 10 percent profit target. The site advertises no consistency rule while the terms still contain an active consistency clause that can fail a challenge. And the advertised 90 percent split is shown as 85 percent or 75 percent in the firm's own scaling calculator.PROS:
- Trading since 2012, one of the longest records in the category
- Holds an Anjouan brokerage licence where most rivals hold none
- The loosest drawdown rules measured on this site: 7.5 percent daily and 15 percent maximum in phase one
- Drawdown is static and measured on initial balance, not trailing
- No time limit on any evaluation, and news, weekends, expert advisors and copy trading all permitted
- Scaling doubles the account across ten steps, plus free competition and education routes
CONS:
- FTP instant funding costs about four times the two-step at 50,000 dollars, pays a lower split and still has a 10 percent target
- The site advertises no consistency rule while the terms carry an active consistency clause
- The advertised 90 percent split is not supported by the firm's own calculator, which shows 85 or 75 percent
- The scaling ceiling is stated inconsistently as 2M, 240K and 768K in different places
- The terms reserve an absolute right to withdraw any trader without explanation
- No per-payout proof published, only headline totals and a named feed
- The funded-trader program of Axi, a broker founded in 2007 — no challenge fee, you fund your own account (from $500)
- Capital scales from $5,000 to $1,000,000 across six stages, as a multiple of your own equity
- Profit split runs 0% at Seed up to 80% at the top — earned by progression, not the 90% some sites quote
- Everything is gated by the proprietary Edge Score, which Axi does not fully publish and can change at any time
- The Axi group is regulated (ASIC, FCA), but Select runs through AxiTrader LLC, an offshore St Vincent entity, outside that perimeter
★★★★★
More details +Axi Select
Axi Select is a no-challenge-fee funded program from Axi, an established broker founded in 2007. Instead of paying to pass a demo, you fund your own live account (from $500) and Axi allocates its own capital on top as you climb six stages, from $5,000 at Seed to $1,000,000 at Pro M, with the split rising from 0% to a maximum of 80%. Two things to understand before you start. The regulatory position is easy to over-credit: the Axi group is genuinely regulated (ASIC, FCA, DFSA), but Axi Select is operated by AxiTrader LLC, an offshore St Vincent entity, OUTSIDE that perimeter. And everything is gated by the proprietary Edge Score, which Axi does not fully publish and reserves the right to change at any time.PROS:
- No challenge fee, no monthly fee, no reset fee - you are not buying an evaluation
- Backed by Axi, an established and elsewhere-regulated broker operating since 2007
- Capital scales to a real $1,000,000 at a competitive 80% top split
- Quarantine gives second chances in the middle stages rather than instant removal
- Monthly automatic payouts with a payout certificate
- A genuinely trader-aligned structure: you are rewarded for proven skill, not for passing a demo
CONS:
- The program is run by AxiTrader LLC, an unregulated offshore SVG entity - the group licences do not protect Select participants
- Not truly free: you fund and risk at least $500 of your own money and pay standard trading costs
- Everything is gated by a black-box Edge Score the firm can change at will
- Seed pays 0%, and reaching the $1m/80% tier needs six stages at Edge Score 90 and $20,000 of your own equity
- Separate CFD and Futures programs with model-specific rules
- CFD funded news restrictions, profitable-day requirements and Guardian Shield controls
- Futures consistency, buffers and payout caps vary by plan, size and purchase date
- Five payouts qualify for Live review; promotion is discretionary
- CFD payouts have a 3% processing fee and caps on selected accounts
★★★★★
More details +Blue Guardian
Blue Guardian offers simulated CFD and Futures programs plus a separately earned Futures Live tier. CFD models have stage-specific news restrictions, qualifying days and floating-loss controls; Nano consistency is not the same as Standard. Futures payout caps and buffers vary by size and model, with dated changes for Express and Direct. Five payouts create Live-review eligibility rather than automatic promotion. The detailed help pages should be checked alongside the purchased account terms.PROS:
- Static maximum drawdown on CFD Two Step Standard and Nano
- Separate CFD and Futures program choices
- Own-account trade copying permitted
- Futures Reserve offers daily-loss removal option
- Multiple trading platforms across the two markets
CONS:
- Funded CFD news restrictions differ from evaluation permission
- Guardian Shield can reduce profit share or breach accounts
- Qualifying days, consistency and withdrawal buffers vary by model
- CFD processing fee and selected payout caps
- Futures caps vary by size; Live promotion is discretionary
- Some homepage claims conflict with detailed help rules
- Prop arm of Blueberry Markets, an ASIC-regulated Australian broker (since 2016); simulated forex/CFD on MT4/MT5/TradeLocker/DXtrade
- Signature: real regulated-broker parentage — genuine infrastructure and longevity most standalone props lack
- Permissive rules: no consistency rule, no time limit, split 80% up to 90%, scaling to a simulated $2M
- Catch: ASIC covers the broker, not the challenges (offshore); documented breach-at-payout complaints
- 1-/2-/3-step + Instant Funding; sizes $5K–$200K; swap-free available; no US traders
★★★★★
More details +Blueberry Funded
Blueberry Funded launched in August 2024 as the prop arm of the broker Blueberry Markets, and the broker relationship is structurally real: funded traders can take payouts straight into a Blueberry Markets trading account. The operating entity is Blueberry Markets (SVG) LLC in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, so the prop product itself is unregulated, and residents of the United States and Australia are both on the restricted list. Six plans run in parallel: 1-Step, Flex 1-Step, Prime 2-Step, Instant Elite, Instant Lite and a separate Synthetic Indices challenge, priced from $25 for a $5,000 synthetic account and $44 for a $5,000 1-Step, scaling 25% every three months to a simulated $2,000,000 with the split rising to 90%. There is no payout on demand: the first withdrawal comes 14 days after activation, or 7 with a paid add-on. Platforms are MetaTrader 5 and TradeLocker only. Its Trustpilot rating is currently unavailable on the Trustpilot official website, with 35% of 1,725 reviews at one star.PROS:
- Genuine broker backing, with payouts payable directly into a Blueberry Markets trading account
- Cheap evaluations: $25 for a $5,000 synthetic account and $44 for a $5,000 1-Step, with no discount code needed on 1-Step
- Instant Elite carries no daily drawdown at all, which is rare
- Scaling of 25% every three months to a simulated $2,000,000, with the split rising to 90%
- Public rules document and a live, timestamped payout tracker verified by a third party
- Account reset option lets you restart a phase instead of rebuying
- No consistency rule on 1-Step, Flex or Prime
CONS:
- Not available to residents of the United States or Australia
- No payout on demand; the first withdrawal is 14 days after activation, or 7 with a paid add-on
- Trustpilot rating unavailable on the Trustpilot official website, with 35% of 1,725 reviews at one star
- Martingale, grid, tick scalping and high-frequency trading are prohibited, with a five-minute minimum hold on every position
- Flex bans weekend holding and cuts the split from 85% to 60% on a second news-trading strike
- MetaTrader 5 and TradeLocker only; TradingView is not offered
- The firm publishes three different trader counts across three of its own pages
- Dubai company (Bright Global FZCO) with publicly named leadership; unregulated
- Base 80%; 90% is a paid add-on; 100% needs three scale-ups (12+ months)
- Static on both 2-Step plans; the 1-Step TRAILS in real time off equity
- Their own example breaches an account that is only 3.5% down
- The fee refund is a PAID ADD-ON; no minimum payout (withdraw from $0.01)
★★★★★
More details +Bright Funded
Bright Funded is a Dubai firm (Bright Global FZCO) running three plans on DXtrade, cTrader and MT5, with no consistency rule and weekend holding allowed. Two points deserve attention before you buy: the 1-Step uses a real-time TRAILING drawdown - the firm's own worked example breaches an account that is only 3.5% down - and the fee refund is a paid add-on rather than something included.PROS:
- No consistency rule at all - one of the few firms that can say this
- Static drawdown on the 2-Step Bright (8%) and 2-Step Classic (10%)
- No minimum payout - you can withdraw from $0.01
- Weekend and overnight holding both permitted
- Expert Advisors allowed (though not on DXtrade)
- Three platforms: DXtrade, cTrader and MetaTrader 5
- Payouts processed within one day of request
- No recurring or monthly fees
CONS:
- The 1-Step drawdown trails in real time - their own example breaches an account only 3.5% down
- The fee refund is a PAID ADD-ON - without it, there is no refund at all once you trade
- The base split is 80%; 90% is a paid add-on and 100% needs three scale-ups (12+ months)
- Weekly payouts are a paid add-on; the default first payout is 30 days, then every 14
- News-window profits are deducted, but news-window losses are not compensated
- Singapore-registered prop firm (BuoyTrade Private Limited) offering no-evaluation instant funding on MetaTrader
- Runs on essentially one rule: a 5% static max drawdown — no daily loss limit, no minimum days, no time limit
- 50% base split up to 80%, earned by scaling (FAQ still says “up to 50%” in places)
- One-time desk fee from ~$50, no recurring fees; scales to a $1,024,000 account
- The catch: marketing says real “A-Book” trading, but Terms define it as simulated with “fictitious” funds
★★★★★
More details +BuoyTrade
BuoyTrade pitch is appealing to the right trader: instant funding, essentially a single drawdown rule, no minimum days or time limits, a static buffer that grows with your profits, and a $50 entry that scales to a seven-figure account with no monthly fees. Two caveats: the headline economics are best-case (real starting split 50 percent), and the firm own Terms define the trading as simulated with fictitious funds. Buy on the Terms.PROS:
- Instant funding with essentially one rule: a 5% static max drawdown
- No daily loss limit, no minimum trading days, no time limit, no mandatory stop-loss
- Static drawdown means your buffer grows as you profit
- One-time desk fee from about $50, no recurring fees
- Scales from $1k entry to a $1,024,000 account
CONS:
- Terms define the trading as simulated with fictitious funds, despite real A-Book marketing
- Real starting split is 50 percent; 80 percent only at the top scaling level
- Unregulated; not a broker and does not accept deposits
- One of the longest-running prop firms (brand since 2018), built for swing/long-term traders; simulated forex/CFD on MT5 & Match-Trader
- Signature: balance-based drawdown (from closed balance, not floating equity) + no time limits — positions can breathe
- Scaling that doubles the account at each 10% milestone, advertised to $4M (via the funding ladder; evaluations cap ~$200K)
- Offers swap-free Islamic accounts; base split 90% up to 100% at top VIP tier; accepts US traders
- Note: now an offshore/unregulated structure (Comoros/Costa Rica/Dubai), not a UK-regulated broker
★★★★★
More details +City Traders imperium
City Traders Imperium has been paying traders since 2018, which makes it one of the longest-running firms still operating. It is run by City Traders Imperium Limited, licensed in the Comoros Union under number 15969 with an operating address in Costa Rica, and a Dubai company, CTI FZCO, delivering its academy. Four programmes run in parallel: a 1-Step Challenge from $29, a 2-Step from $39, Instant Funding from $79 and Direct Funding from $229, scaling to $2,000,000 per account and $4,000,000 in total funding. The 1-Step is the standout: an 8% target against a 5% trailing drawdown, with no daily loss limit, no time limit, and news trading, third-party expert advisors, martingale, weekend holds and overnight holds all permitted. Very few firms allow all five. First payouts come at 7 days on the challenges and on demand from day 5 on Direct Funding. The firm does not restrict United States residents. Its Trustpilot profile is the healthiest we have verified this month: 4.2 from 1,625 reviews with only 6% at one star and a 100% reply rate to negative reviews. The main thing to watch is Instant Funding, which starts you on half the advertised balance at a 50% share.PROS:
- Trading since 2018 with a named, public founding team and eight years of payouts
- Trustpilot 4.2 from 1,625 reviews, only 6% at one star, and a 100% reply rate to negative reviews
- The 1-Step Challenge allows third-party EAs, martingale, news trading and weekend holds, with no daily drawdown and no time limit
- Entry from $29, the cheapest we have verified this month, with resets at a 15% discount
- Does not restrict United States residents
- Scaling to $2,000,000 per account and $4,000,000 in total funding
- Public live symbols page with bid, ask and spread refreshed every two seconds
- Payouts stated as approved within 24 hours, with an advertised 8-hour average
- Broad payment options including card, PayPal, crypto, Skrill, Neteller and bank transfer
CONS:
- Instant Funding starts at half the advertised balance on a 50% share until the first 10% milestone
- The Anjouan licence is a registration, not financial supervision, and CTI states it is not a broker or investment adviser
- VIP criteria for the 100% profit share are not published on the buying pages
- Only 53 instruments across five asset classes, with no individual stocks
- Martingale and third-party EAs are blocked on three of the four programmes
- Fees are non-refundable except as set out in the refund policy
- The 2-Step carries a 5% daily drawdown that the 1-Step does not
- Dubai (DIFC) prop firm (Finotive Funding Technologies Ltd), operating since 2021; simulated forex/CFD on MT5 & Match-Trader
- Signature: a 10% “strike” soft-breach system — rule breaks cut your next payout to a 10% split rather than closing the account
- Cheap entry (from ~$25), sizes $2,500–$200,000, scaling advertised to $5.4M
- Three families: Challenge, Instant Funding, and Finotive Pro (1% monthly salary + 100% split after 30 days)
- Payouts on demand then ~weekly (Fridays); watch the discretionary “holistic assessment” behind payout reductions
★★★★★
More details +Finotive Funding
Finotive Funding is a Dubai (DIFC) simulated forex and CFD prop firm operating since 2021 on MT5 and Match-Trader. Entry is cheap from about 25 dollars, sizes run 2,500 to 200,000 dollars, and scaling is advertised to 5.4 million. Its defining feature is a 10 percent strike system: rule breaks cut your next payout to a 10 percent split rather than closing the account, though the discretionary holistic assessment behind reductions is its top complaint. The Pro tier adds a 1 percent monthly salary and a 100 percent split after 30 days. Drawdown is static and payouts are weekly on Fridays.PROS:
- Cheap entry and broad instruments (FX, metals, indices, energy, crypto, stock CFDs)
- Forgiving static (non-trailing) drawdown
- Finotive Pro pays a 1% monthly salary, 100% split after 30 days, and refunds the fee
- Weekly Friday payouts, with fast reports from many traders
- Instant funding and 1-step options; scaling advertised to 5.4M
CONS:
- The 10% strike reductions rest on a discretionary holistic assessment (top complaint)
- Instant funding pays a lower base split
- A hard breach closes the account with no refund
- Czech prop firm (Fintokei a.s.) with a large Japan/Asia user base; simulated forex/CFD evals on MT4, MT5 and cTrader
- Signature: a Dynamic Performance Reward — the split slides 50–100% based on four behaviours, recalculated each payout
- Branded the first FX/CFD firm with true Instant Payouts (Aug 2025), auto-approved in seconds
- Three programs (StartTrader 3-step, ProTrader 2-step, SwiftTrader instant); accounts to ~EUR 400k
- Strong ~4.5 Trustpilot; note the split is earned/dynamic and rules were tightened in Jan 2025
★★★★★
More details +Fintokei
Fintokei is one of the more solid, actively-operating firms in this space: a Czech company with a large, loyal Japanese user base, a strong ~4.5 Trustpilot, genuinely fast (often instant) payouts, and a broad three-program line-up. Its Dynamic Performance Reward is a legitimately interesting idea, a split you earn through discipline rather than buy. Buy it knowing the specifics: the accounts are simulated, the up-to-100% split is dynamic and often lower, and rules were tightened in early 2025 for newer accounts.PROS:
- Dynamic Performance Reward: higher splits are earned through discipline, not bought
- Industry-first true Instant Payouts (Aug 2025), auto-approved in seconds
- Strong ~4.5 Trustpilot across a thousand-plus reviews
- Three programs (StartTrader, ProTrader, SwiftTrader) and MT4/MT5/cTrader
- Accounts to about EUR 400,000 with scaling
CONS:
- The up-to-100% split is dynamic and often lower in practice
- Reports of sudden bans for prohibited practices (hedging, copy trading)
- Unregulated; aggressive real-time risk monitoring
- Binding terms name a UAE company (GrowthNext F.Z.E.) as the contracting party; unregulated
- Base 80%; 90% via Scale-Up; 95% is a paid add-on (+25-30% of the fee)
- Up to 3.5% is deducted from EVERY payout - an "80%" split nets about 77%
- Static on Stellar 1-Step, 2-Step and Lite; only Stellar Instant trails
- The 3% max risk rule: a second breach permanently caps you at 1% risk for life
★★★★★
More details +Funded Next
FundedNext is a UAE proprietary trading firm operating through GrowthNext F.Z.E. (Ajman Free Zone), running the Stellar range: 1-Step, 2-Step, Lite and Instant. Per its own disclaimer it is a simulation-based platform. The standard profit split is 80% — 90% is reached through the Scale-Up plan, and 95% is a PAID add-on costing 25–30% on top of the challenge fee. A processing fee of up to 3.5% is deducted from EVERY payout, so an 80% share nets 77.2% if the full fee applies. Since 12 January 2026 the 1-Step split starts at 80% rather than 90% — and resetting an older account moves you onto the newer, worse terms. The 1-Step pays on a 5-business-day cycle; standard 2-Step begins at 21 days, then 14. Alternative 2-Step/Lite options change eligibility and share: 3 Day at 60%, On-Demand at 90%, or 95% with the Lifetime Reward add-on. Minimum payout from 20 USD, and only 2 minimum trading days on the 1-Step.PROS:
- Static drawdown on Stellar 1-Step, 2-Step and Lite
- The 100% fee refund is standard and free (not an add-on)
- Four platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader and Match-Trader
- Weekend and overnight holding permitted on CFDs
- Payouts from a $20 minimum, targeted within 24 hours
- No consistency rule on standard CFD accounts
- Scaling to 90% and up to a $4m allocation
- Trustpilot 4.5 from over 73,000 reviews, with no consumer alert
CONS:
- A processing fee of up to 3.5% is taken from every payout - an 80% share nets 77.2% if the full fee applies
- The base split is 80%; 95% is a paid add-on at +25-30% of the fee
- The 3% max risk rule: a second breach permanently caps you at 1% risk for the life of the account
- News-window profits count at 40%, but news-window losses count at 100%
- Withdrawal limits depend on payment method and country; check your eligible routes
- Stellar Instant uses a trailing drawdown and has no fee refund
Firm comparison
Reviewed 5 October 2026. This table separates documented scaling routes, combined-account limits and unresolved claims. Inclusion does not mean every listed firm currently provides a verified $1 million route. Currency, programme and purchase-date conditions matter.
| Firm | Current ceiling or evidence | Route to $1 million | Key conditions and qualifications | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTMO | $2 million combined | Scaling | Four-month performance reviews; 25% increases after qualifying profit and rewards. | Official rules / programme |
| Funded Trading Plus | $2.5 million published ladder | Scaling | Programme-specific profit milestones and discretionary risk review; not initial allocation. | Official rules / programme |
| FTUK | Up to $6.4 million, model-dependent | Scaling | Starting size and selected programme determine the ladder; Instant Level 7 requires its optional unlock. | Official rules / programme |
| E8 Markets | Product and market-specific household limits | Aggregation, subject to each product cap | Official allocation guidance lists $500,000 limits for E8 One and Pro per market and separate account-count limits. Do not assume two $500,000 accounts of one product are permitted. | Official rules / programme |
| The5ers | Up to $4 million on selected routes | Scaling | Bootcamp and Hyper Growth have distinct ladders; an evaluation purchase cap is not the scaled ceiling. | Official rules / programme |
| Alpha Capital Group | $2 million across scaled accounts | Scaling | Eligible Alpha Pro, Swing and Three accounts: 10% growth can qualify for an increase equal to 10% of initial balance. | Official rules / programme |
| FunderPro | $5 million | Scaling | 10% profit in each of three consecutive months qualifies for a 50% increase under the published plan. | Official rules / programme |
| FundedNext | Up to $4 million on eligible programmes | Scaling | Pro requires four qualifying rewards, 4% growth per qualifying cycle and at least two months. Merged accounts are excluded; Stellar Lite and older purchases follow separate rules. | Official rules / programme |
| FundingPips | $2 million per Prime Account | Prime scaling | Prime adds 10% per scale-up; profit targets and qualifying days change by level. The ordinary allocation cap does not establish a lifetime Prime limit. | Official rules / programme |
| OFP Funding | $5 million advertised in official scaling article | Scaling claim; confirm applicable contract | The article describes 20% profit over three months for a 25% initial-size increase. Confirm the current product is eligible before relying on this route. | Official rules / programme |
| FXIFY | Up to $4 million in the published $400,000 example | Scaling | 10% return and two profitable months out of three; first increase 25%, then quarterly doubling under the published schedule. | Official rules / programme |
| Instant Funding | $1 million combined starting balances; $1.28 million Pro/Lite scaling | Aggregation or eligible scaling | Pro/Lite double at a 10% gain. Other named models have different growth caps; scaled increases do not use the starting-allocation cap. | Official rules / programme |
| Maven Trading | $1 million scaled; $200,000 starting funded capital | Scaling | 10% over four months, 2.5% monthly and at least one payout each month; qualifying increase 25%. | Official rules / programme |
| Goat Funded Trader | Million-dollar ceiling not established by the checked scaling schedule | Unconfirmed at $1 million | The current four-level plan publishes 15%–50% increases based on original size and payout/time conditions; this does not itself verify the former $2 million claim. | Official rules / programme |
| Blue Guardian | Official guidance conflicts: $2 million / $4 million | Scaling, exact ceiling unresolved | The same general-rules page names both ceilings and a 12%-in-three-months requirement. Obtain the binding model-specific limit. | Official rules / programme |
| Hola Prime | Up to $4 million | Scaling | Four-month cycles, 10% net simulated profit, two profitable months, two payouts and positive balance; increases vary by scaling stage. | Official rules / programme |
| City Traders Imperium | $2 million per account; $4 million across two | Direct / Instant scaling | Direct doubles at each 10% milestone. Challenge allocation limits are separate from these routes. | Official rules / programme |
| Top One Trader | Official PRO v2 pages disagree: $2 million / $5 million | Scaling, confirm applicable cap | The allocation page and overview conflict. A household starting cap must not be presented as the final scaled ceiling. | Official rules / programme |
| Think Capital | $1.5 million overall; Bolt capped at $500,000 scaled | Eligible challenge scaling | Lightning, Dual Step and Nexus: 10% over three months and three withdrawals for a 20% initial-balance increase. Instant has separate terms. | Official rules / programme |
| Finotive Funding | $2.04 million aggregate Challenge / Pro; $680,000 per account | Multiple scaled accounts | The current terms cap Instant Standard/Lite at $680,000 scaled. A single account does not reach $1 million under the stated cap. | Official rules / programme |
| Rebels Funding | Homepage lists up to $320,000 simulated accounts | Seven-figure route not verified | Do not treat the earlier approximate $640,000 claim as a current contractual cap or proof of a million-dollar route. Check the exact RCF contract and programme. | Official rules / programme |
| Blueberry Funded | $2 million per trader | Scaling | 10% net profit across three months and four payouts; eligible increases follow the original programme rules. | Official rules / programme |
| Axi Select | $1 million at Pro M | Performance-based stage progression | Six stages with equity, Edge Score, duration and trading requirements. Not a $1 million account issued on joining; the old trader-count claim has been removed. | Official rules / programme |
| Quant Tekel / QT Funded | $300,000 total funded allocation | No $1 million route under the checked limit | Instant has a $100,000 sublimit that counts toward the total. The old $400,000 combined figure was incorrect. | Official rules / programme |
| Top Tier Trader / TX3 Funding | $1.6 million combined before scaling; $2 million total stated | Aggregation or eligible Pro scaling | Only Pro scales. The page also says accounts scale to $2 million but later limits scaled Pro to $1 million within the $2 million total; confirm that distinction. | Official rules / programme |
| Fintokei | Published ProTrader schedules extend beyond entry caps | Programme / currency-specific scaling; confirm current contract | Official provider documents include seven-figure tiers. The former blanket “No” based on a $400,000 figure was unsupported; check the currency and applicable document version. | Official rules / programme |
| BrightFunded | No published upper scaling balance limit | Scaling | 30% of original size per qualifying four-month review; 10% total profit, two profitable months, two payouts and nonnegative balance. | Official rules / programme |
| Aqua Funded | $4 million | Scaling | 12% return over three months can qualify for 25% of initial allocation, subject to approval. The previous “No mechanism published” statement was incorrect. | Official rules / programme |
| AudaCity Capital | Up to $2 million scaled | Programme-specific scaling | Separate purchased allocation from later growth. Official programme pages describe scaling, so an initial $240,000 limit is not proof that $1 million is unavailable. | Official rules / programme |
| Get Funded Now | $400,000 total allocation | No $1 million route under the checked limit | Largest published single size $200,000; multiple accounts remain separate. | Official rules / programme |
| Lux Trading Firm | $10 million final funded tier | Evaluation then funded scaling | Current rules provide staged growth. Earlier listed “$1,000,000 for £999” is retained here as a historical price reference, not a current offer or immediate funded access. | Official rules / programme |
| WeGetFunded | Current homepage: up to $400,000; legacy site advertises $4 million scaling | Current seven-figure eligibility unresolved | Legacy marketing must not be transferred to a new purchase without confirmation of the applicable contract. | Official rules / programme |
| Lark Funding | Published 1-Step sizes up to $200,000 | Seven-figure route not verified | The checked programme overview does not establish permission to aggregate or scale to $1 million. Confirm allocation separately. | Official rules / programme |
| Ment Funding | $2 million direct account advertised; eligible smaller accounts scale to $5 million | Large account or eligible scaling | Direct $2 million accounts do not scale. Earlier listed “$1,000,000 for $8,600” is a historical price reference, not a current quote; account conditions still apply. | Official rules / programme |
| Nordic Funder | $500,000 largest staged FX/CFD account | Multiple accounts allowed; $1 million combined permission unresolved | The current FAQ allows several accounts but does not establish a combined million-dollar cap. The old “Yes” needs written confirmation. | Official rules / programme |
| FX2 Funding | Homepage $400,000; allocation FAQ $300,000 | No verified $1 million route | Official figures conflict below the category threshold; confirm the current account-combination rules. | Official rules / programme |
| Alpha Trader Firm / Alpha Funded | $4 million combined under current help-centre policy | Aggregation or eligible scaling | 50% of original size after qualifying 60-day reviews; free, $5,000 and special-offer accounts are excluded. Older blog scaling figures differ. | Official rules / programme |
| BuoyTrade | $1,024,000 published Direct/Apex ladder | Scaling; aggregate terms need confirmation | Published ladder doubles by stage, but the FAQ and older terms disagree on overall allocation. Do not treat $10.24 million as an unconditional allowance. | Official rules / programme |
Three routes need separate labels
This comparison checks whether each firm documents a path to at least $1 million of permitted allocation. Rows without a verified route are included to distinguish them from qualifying options. Separate a single seven-figure account, permitted aggregation of smaller accounts and growth from a smaller starting balance. Each route should identify the programme, account currency and whether access depends on passing an evaluation or later performance milestones.
A promotional ceiling without supporting allocation rules is insufficient. If marketing and the rulebook disagree, mark the figure as unresolved rather than selecting the larger number. Limits may apply per trader, strategy, household or product family, so the relevant ceiling is not always the sum of accounts visible at checkout.
Available now is different from available eventually
For a large starting account, record the purchase price and the evaluation attached to it. For aggregation, verify both the number of accounts allowed and the combined cap. Check whether account merging is available and whether copying the same trades across accounts is permitted. Several independent accounts can also require separate payout requests and fee payments.
For a scaling route, show the starting allocation and the milestones before the seven-figure point. The dedicated scaling comparison examines growth beyond that threshold in more detail. A distant upper limit should not be presented as the capital issued after the first challenge.
Measure the million in usable loss allowance
An illustrative $1 million account with a 5% maximum loss allowance begins with $50,000 of total loss room, before considering additional daily, position or trailing restrictions. The account holder does not own the million-dollar label, and cannot treat it as a withdrawable balance.
Check whether position limits allow the strategy to use the larger account proportionately. A nominal increase may not produce an equivalent increase in permitted exposure. Also establish whether withdrawing profit changes the floor or reduces the buffer. The practical value of a large allocation depends on those mechanics and on the conditions under which rewards are paid.
Avoid buying toward an unsupported total
Before paying for multiple challenges, obtain the allocation rule for the exact combination. Confirm whether purchases already held, other programmes and copied strategies count toward the same maximum. A provider offering many account sizes has not necessarily authorised every possible combination.
This category does not suit someone looking for a $1 million cash loan, a personal investment balance or guaranteed purchasing power across several firms. It is also a poor starting point for traders whose strategy has not yet demonstrated that it can work within a smaller account’s limits. Choose the allocation route after establishing the permitted risk and total cost, rather than using the largest available number as the reason to enter.
Million-dollar funding questions
Is the advertised $1 million available as soon as I join?
Identify whether the figure describes a starting account, a combined allocation or a future scaling ceiling. These are different offers. Request the starting amount and the milestones required to reach seven figures, including any minimum review periods, additional purchases or account-combination restrictions.
How much can I actually lose on a million-dollar prop account?
Use the programme’s breach threshold rather than the nominal balance as the risk constraint. For example, a hypothetical 5% maximum loss on $1 million equals $50,000 before considering daily or position limits. The headline allocation is not an amount you are free to lose or withdraw.
Does a seven-figure allocation guarantee a proportionately larger payout?
No. Reward caps, qualifying profit, the split and withdrawal frequency determine what can be received. Ask for a worked payout example at the million-dollar tier. Also establish whether the allocation is simulated and whether the largest advertised account has the same reward conditions as the entry plan.
Can I combine smaller accounts to reach a $1 million allocation?
Only where the provider’s account-combination rules allow it. Check the total allocation permitted per trader, eligible account types and whether balances can actually merge. Five separate accounts can involve different operational restrictions from one million-dollar account, even if their advertised balances add up to the same figure.
What does a provider mean by a million dollars of buying power?
Ask whether the figure describes nominal account balance, leveraged exposure or a conditional allocation. These measures are not interchangeable. Request the actual loss allowance, contract limits and starting balance alongside the headline figure so that the amount of market exposure is not confused with usable risk capital.