Filter
Showing 73–84 of 115 results
- CFD/forex prop firm (Funded Academy F.Z.E., Ajman Free Zone, UAE, incorporated August 2025) trading simulated capital on MT5 and cTrader — unregulated
- 85% split on 1-Step, 80% on 2-Step, rising to 95% through scaling — earned, not paid for
- 8% trailing drawdown on 1-Step; 10% static on 2-Step
- The Pro Flex vs Standard choice is locked at checkout and decides weekend/news holding — no upgrading later
- The “Academy” is free optional education, not a paid bundle. Not open to US or UK traders
★★★★★
More details +Sabio Trade
Funded Academy is a clean, straightforward evaluation with several trader-friendly touches: no consistency rule, no time limit, a low $100 payout minimum, 12-hour processing, a strong 85% base split on 1-Step, and a genuinely free education primer with no upsell. The caveats: it is young and unregulated, the accounts are simulated, and the Pro Flex vs Standard choice is LOCKED AT CHECKOUT - get it wrong and you cannot add weekend or news-holding rights without buying a new challenge. High-impact news trading is allowed, subject to a two-minute blackout either side of a high-impact release. Note it does not accept US or UK traders.PROS:
- Strong 85% base split on 1-Step (80% on 2-Step), rising to 95% through earned scaling
- No consistency rule and no time limit
- Low $100 payout minimum, processed within 12 hours
- A genuinely free, no-signup education primer with no upsell attached
- No recurring monthly fee on funded accounts; challenge resets at a 10% discount
- Clear, well-documented public rulebook
CONS:
- The Pro Flex vs Standard choice is locked at checkout - you can never upgrade Standard to Pro Flex
- 1-Step funded accounts cannot hold overnight at all
- EAs, copy trading, VPS, hedging and scalping are all prohibited
- Not open to US or UK traders
- The broker-backed prop arm of Key To Markets (FSC-Mauritius-regulated); simulated CFD challenges
- Distinctive: an established, regulated broker (~15 yrs) behind the challenge — rare reassurance in the sector
- Signature rule: “Binding Scale-Up” — one payout at 4%, then the account auto-scales and the balance resets
- 70–80% base rising to 90% (up to 100% NewEra), earned via scaling; trailing equity-based max drawdown
- The catch: paid only on the 4% threshold even if you earned more; “real capital” marketing vs simulated Terms
★★★★★
More details +Key To Prop
Key To Prop standout is credibility: being run by an established, FSC-Mauritius-regulated broker is a genuine reassurance most challenge shops cannot offer, and the scaling-based path to a 90% split with no paid upgrades is fair. The trade-offs are the rigid payout structure and marketing gloss: Binding Scale-Up pays on a fixed 4% cadence and resets your balance each time, the accounts are simulated despite real-capital language, and the max drawdown trails on equity.PROS:
- Operated by an established, FSC-Mauritius-regulated broker (~15 years) - rare in the sector
- Raw spreads and institutional liquidity behind the challenge
- Split scales to 90% (up to 100% NewEra) through performance, not paid upgrades
- One-time fee, no monthly subscription
- Broad CFD range (forex, indices, metals, stocks, crypto), scaling to $300k
CONS:
- Binding Scale-Up forces a payout-then-reset cadence; you bank only the 4% each cycle
- Max drawdown trails on equity (including open profit), stricter than end-of-day
- Own pages conflict on funding cap ($250k vs $300k) and split ceiling; per-lot commissions apply
Crypto-focused prop firm operated by PROPW INNOVATIONS DMCC, with simulated funded accounts up to 200,000 USDT.
Two filled questionnaire programs: Standard Mode and Pro Mode, both with static drawdown and 5x leverage.
Default reward split is 80%, with a stated maximum of 90%; payouts are made in USDT.
Watch the 45% consistency rule, 60-second minimum trade duration and 10-calendar-day maximum position hold.
★★★★★
More details +PropW
PropW is a crypto-focused simulated prop firm with static-drawdown Standard and Pro programs, USDT payouts and a clear 45% consistency rule. The setup is interesting for crypto-native traders, but the simulated/unregulated model and rule details need careful review before buying.PROS:
- Crypto-focused model with PropW's own simulated trading environment and up to 5x leverage.
- Standard Mode and Pro Mode both use static drawdown, which is easier to understand than trailing drawdown.
- USDT payouts, an 80% default reward split and a stated path up to 90%.
- The 45% consistency rule can delay a payout request, but no challenge restart is required once the ratio is brought back inside the limit.
CONS:
- PropW is a simulated-account firm and says it is not regulated by a financial regulator.
- Some payout and pricing details should be checked at checkout because not every account-size fee is exposed in one clean static table.
- The trading rules are crypto-prop specific, including a 60-second minimum trade duration and a 10-calendar-day maximum holding period.
- Not a challenge firm: a US prop firm (founded 1997) that trains and funds traders with its own real capital
- You apply, interview and complete a paid qualification program before real capital is allocated
- Real firm money, not a simulator — a 1099 contractor role starting ~$25k, scaling with performance
- 65–90% split (60–90% on currencies), paid monthly by ACH with bonuses
- A $199 desk fee plus a trading bond and tuition — but the exact figures are not published; you apply to learn them
★★★★★
More details +Maverick Trading
Maverick Trading is not a challenge shop. It is a US proprietary trading firm founded in 1997 that recruits, trains and funds traders with its OWN REAL capital as 1099 independent contractors of its trading LLCs. The path is apply, interview, complete a paid qualification program (1,000+ hours, tests, a coach-monitored demo), then get allocated real firm capital (starting around $25k, scaling with no cap). The split is 65-90% (60-90% on currencies), paid monthly by ACH with milestone bonuses, and the firm charges no commission mark-up or spread fees and imposes no volume requirement. The trade-offs are effort and transparency: the exact tuition and required trading bond are NOT published (you apply to learn them), the path is long, and the funded start is modest - but it is real capital, and the firm has done this since 1997.PROS:
- Real firm capital, not a simulated funded account - allocated after you qualify
- Genuine long-form mentorship and a 25-year track record (founded 1997)
- High 65-90% profit split (60-90% on currencies), rising with consistency, no cap on levels
- Paid monthly by ACH, with performance and milestone bonuses
- No commission mark-up and no spread fees - incentives aligned with trader P&L
- No volume requirement; high-frequency trading actively discouraged
- Remote and part-time trading explicitly allowed
CONS:
- Opaque upfront pricing: a $199 desk fee plus a required trading bond and tuition, but the exact tuition and bond figures are NOT published - you must apply to learn them
- A long, effort-heavy path to funding (weeks of coursework, tests and monitored demo) versus a same-week challenge
- Modest starting capital (~$25,000) versus the headline simulated accounts of challenge firms
- No published hard drawdown or daily-loss number - risk control is discretionary and coach-driven
- No regulator backstop (it trades its own capital and is not a brokerage)
- One of the oldest US futures prop firms (Leeloo Trading, Montana, since 2019); simulated on CME minis/micros via Rithmic
- Signature: explicitly “not a profit split” — 100% of your first $12,500, then 90%, as a discretionary release
- The catch: payouts gated behind subjective rules (30% best-day, no-flipping, no home-runs, Profit Guarding)
- Drawdown is an intraday trailing auto-liquidation; no daily loss limit
- Evaluation accounts are a monthly subscription; firm is phasing out some legacy programs
★★★★★
More details +LeeLoo Trading
Leeloo Trading has real strengths: a long-established (2019) US futures firm, unusually honest that everything is simulated, with a wide platform choice and a generous headline structure, 100% of your first $12,500 then 90%. The trade-offs are the discretionary payout rules and the current transition. Because the payout is a discretionary release of simulated profits, it is gated behind subjective rules that are the main source of complaints, the drawdown is an intraday trailing auto-liquidation, and evaluations are a monthly subscription.PROS:
- Long-established (2019) US futures firm with a long track record
- Unusually transparent that accounts are simulated in all stages
- Generous headline structure: 100% of first $12,500, then 90%
- Wide platform choice (Rithmic, NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Bookmap and more)
- No daily loss limit
CONS:
- Payouts are discretionary and gated behind subjective rules (30% rule, no-flipping, Profit Guarding)
- Drawdown is a strict intraday trailing auto-liquidation
- Evaluation accounts are a recurring monthly subscription
- US futures prop firm (Florida) trading simulated CME futures — unregulated
- 80/20 base split; the 90/10 is a discretionary promotion after $5,000 in payouts, not a tier you buy
- Four account styles from $25k to $250k; OG accounts use a forgiving realised-only drawdown
- No daily loss limit on three of the four styles; subscription drops to $0/month once you pass
- OG accounts pass through a separate unpaid Exhibition stage — where one Tier-1 news slip forfeits everything, with no appeal
★★★★★
More details +
Funded Futures Network is one of the more forgiving futures evaluations: three of its four account styles have no daily loss limit, OG accounts use a realised-only trailing drawdown so intraday noise will not fail you, the subscription drops to $0 once you pass, and payouts are same-day with no fees. Go in knowing two things. The funded account nearly everyone trades is SIMULATED, and the advertised 90% split is a discretionary, risk-manager-approved promotion (after $5,000 in payouts), not a tier you select. OG accounts also pass through a separate unpaid Exhibition stage where a single Tier-1 news slip forfeits everything with no appeal - which is exactly why the newer MAX accounts exist to skip it.
PROS:
- No daily loss limit on three of the four account styles
- OG accounts use a realised-only drawdown - an intraday dip on an open trade will not fail you
- Subscription drops to $0/month once you pass the evaluation
- Same-day payout requests, no fixed cycle, no fees on any method
- A consistency slip in evaluation raises your target rather than failing you
- Well-documented, recently-updated public rulebook
CONS:
- The 90% split is a discretionary human-approved promotion after $5,000 in payouts, not a selectable tier
- OG accounts add a separate Exhibition stage, where one Tier-1 news slip forfeits the account with no appeal
- The $10,000 payout cap is per user across all accounts, with per-account caps on top
- Your best-day figure never resets, quietly tightening the consistency rule over time
- US-based (Texas) multi-asset CFD prop firm on DXtrade, Match-Trader and cTrader via ThinkMarkets — unregulated
- 75% base split; the advertised “up to 90%” is a paid add-on
- 3-Step line has no daily loss limit; daily loss is calculated on closed balance, not equity
- The distinctive “max lots with risk” rule frees capacity when you move a stop to breakeven — it rewards discipline
- Marketed as “live, real profits” but the Terms describe notional funding with Blink as a possible counterparty
★★★★★
More details +Blink Funding Review 2026
Blink Funding has one of the more thoughtfully-designed rule sets around: a 3-Step line with no daily loss limit, a balance-based (not equity-based) daily calculation, a closed-balance trailing drawdown that locks at your starting balance, a "max lots with risk" mechanic that rewards moving positions to breakeven, and a promise that you keep your share of gains even on a hard breach. No time limit, no monthly fee, US base with named infrastructure partners. Weigh against that: the split is 75% not the 90% the marketing leads with; leverage is lower than the cards imply; stop-loss-free and weekend trading are PAID add-ons; and the "live markets, real profits" pitch is contradicted by a Terms document describing NOTIONAL funding with Blink as a possible counterparty. No registered entity or number is published.PROS:
- The 3-Step line has no daily loss limit, paired with a low 5% static drawdown
- Daily loss is calculated on the previous day's closing balance, not equity - a fairer method
- The 1-Step trailing drawdown is on closed balance and locks at your starting balance after +6%
- The "max lots with risk" rule rewards moving stops to breakeven, freeing capacity
- You keep your share of gains even if you hard-breach while holding them
- No time limit, no monthly fee, US base with named infrastructure partners
- Blink discloses its counterparty conflict of interest openly, which many peers do not
CONS:
- The funded account is marketed as "live, real profits" but the Terms describe notional funding with Blink as a possible direct counterparty
- The base split is 75%; the advertised "up to 90%" is a paid add-on
- Trading without a stop-loss and holding over the weekend are each paid add-ons at a 10% surcharge
- No registered company name, number or address is published anywhere
- Withdrawing all your gains locks the drawdown and can forfeit the account - partial withdrawals needed
- US (Delaware) futures prop firm since 2019 — CME/NYMEX/COMEX/CBOT on TradingView & Tradovate
- Signature: a “SafetyNet” buffer + monetized-SIM ladder — earn real cash from a demo “Virtual Live” account before real capital
- The catch: the SafetyNet cushion is never withdrawable; you only take profit above starting balance + buffer, split 80/20
- Two lines: DAY (EOD trailing drawdown) and UProfit One (static); monthly, sizes $50K–$150K
- 4 profitable days + a 30% consistency rule before payout; US traders accepted; intraday only, caps at $150K
★★★★★
More details +Up Profit
UProfit is a US futures funding firm, a Delaware LLC operating since 2019, trading CME, NYMEX, COMEX and CBOT contracts on TradingView and Tradovate. Its defining feature is a two-part structure: a SafetyNet buffer, a non-withdrawable cushion on top of your starting balance so you only withdraw profit above starting balance plus buffer, and a monetized-simulation ladder where you earn real cash from a demo Virtual Live account before graduating to real capital. It runs two lines, the DAY program with end-of-day trailing drawdown and the newer UProfit One with static drawdown, both monthly subscriptions with sizes from 50,000 to 150,000. The split is up to 80 percent, with a 30 percent consistency rule and 4 profitable days before withdrawal, and US traders are accepted.PROS:
- Long track record for the sector, operating since 2019
- Choice of end-of-day trailing (DAY) or static (UProfit One) drawdown
- Earn real cash from a monetized simulator before risking real capital
- US-friendly futures firm on TradingView and Tradovate
- Payouts processed within about 24 business hours when conditions are met
CONS:
- The SafetyNet buffer is never withdrawable and delays the first payout
- A 30 percent consistency rule and 4 profitable days gate withdrawals
- Some 2026 reports of payouts stuck in requested status and a disputed cancellation
- US (Florida) futures prop firm — CME/COMEX/NYMEX/CBOT on 15+ platforms (NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView…)
- Signature: day-one payouts from a still-simulated funded account, no minimum profit days, once you clear a buffer
- The catch: PRO is SIM with a stricter intraday trailing drawdown; buffer-zone profits only pay (50–80%) if you close the account
- One-step Test (min 5 days), monthly ~$150–$360, sizes $25K–$150K, up to 5 accounts; no daily loss limit
- 80/20 split (PRO), 90/10 on live PRO+; US traders accepted; intraday futures only, caps at $150K/account
★★★★★
More details +Take Profit Trader
Take Profit Trader is a US futures funding firm based in Windermere, Florida, trading only exchange-listed futures across CME, COMEX, NYMEX and CBOT on 15-plus third-party platforms such as NinjaTrader, Tradovate and TradingView. Its defining feature is day-one payouts: after a one-step Test of at least 5 trading days, the funded PRO account lets you withdraw from day one with no minimum profit days, once you clear a buffer. The catch is that the funded PRO account is still simulated and uses a stricter intraday trailing drawdown, and profits inside the buffer only pay out, at 50 to 80 percent, if you close the account. The split is 80/20 on PRO and 90/10 on the optional live PRO+, there is no daily loss limit, and US traders are accepted.PROS:
- Day-one payouts with no minimum profit days once the buffer is cleared
- Simple one-step Test, passable in 5 trading days
- No daily loss limit; risk governed only by the trailing drawdown
- Full contract size immediately, no scaling ramp; up to 5 funded accounts
- US-friendly futures firm on 15-plus mainstream platforms
CONS:
- PRO uses a stricter intraday trailing drawdown than the Test
- Buffer-zone profits only pay out (50-80%) if you close the account
- Monthly subscription cost plus a one-time activation fee
- Dubai company (MFC Technologies LLC FZ) - not London; unregulated
- Base 70% (Instant) or 80%; 90/95/100% are paid add-ons at +17.5% of the plan price each
- Static 10% on the Scale Up; the 1-Step and Instant both TRAIL
- Payouts are capped at $5,000 per cycle; a 15% consistency rule applies once funded
- News trading and weekend holding are paid add-ons, restricted by default
★★★★★
More details +My Funded Capital
My Funded Capital is a Dubai-registered firm - MFC Technologies LLC FZ - not a London one, as an earlier version of this review stated. It sells three programmes: Instant Funding, a 1-Step Challenge and the Scale Up Challenge, on DXtrade, GooeyPro and cTrader. Base splits are 70-80%, with 90-100% sold as paid add-ons, and payouts are capped at $5,000 per cycle.PROS:
- Scale Up Challenge uses a static 10% drawdown
- Entry from $19 on the $2,000 Scale Up account
- EAs, bots and copy trading are all permitted
- Payouts processed in around 24 hours on average
- Weekly payout cycles on the 1-Step and Instant Funding
- Scaling up to $500,000 on the Scale Up Challenge
- One-time fee with no subscription
- Instant Funding has a free split ladder from 70% to 90%
CONS:
- Payouts are capped at $5,000 per cycle - the Payouts page separately advertises uncapped withdrawals
- A 15% consistency rule applies once you are funded
- The 1-Step drawdown TRAILS, despite the homepage claiming no trailing drawdowns
- 90%, 95% and 100% splits are paid add-ons, at +17.5% of the plan price each
- News trading and weekend holding are also paid add-ons, restricted by default
- The binding terms state there are no refunds on any services purchased
- New Cyprus firm (Stampede Ltd, Nicosia) selling simulated FX, metals, indices, oil and crypto evaluations on Match-Trader; capital to $200k
- Signature: static drawdown on every plan on sale, plus no consistency rule and no time limit
- Three plans: Classic (2-step, fee returned when you pass), Sprint (1-step, 6% floor), Sprint Turbo (1-step, 3% floor, from $39)
- 80% split as standard; 90% only as a paid checkout add-on at +20% of the fee
- Watch: launched July 2026 with no payout history, unregulated and fully simulated
★★★★★
More details +Stampede
Stampede launched in July 2026 with terms that are unusually clean for the sector: static drawdown on every plan on sale, no consistency rule, no time limit, and on-demand USDC payouts from the first profitable funded trade with no caps or winning-day gates. The Terms are candid too, disclosing both the simulated product and the firm's own conflict of interest in plain language. Go in knowing the trade-off: this is a weeks-old, unregulated firm with no payout record at all, so the quality sits in the rulebook rather than in evidence.PROS:
- Static drawdown on all three plans on sale, with the floor fixed in dollars at purchase
- No consistency rule and no time limit on any challenge plan
- On-demand payouts from the first profitable funded trade, $50 minimum, no caps or winning-day gates
- Classic returns the full fee on top of your first funded payout
- Terms disclose the simulated product and the firm conflict of interest plainly
- Open to all 50 US states, with a 24-hour pre-trade cancellation window on every plan
CONS:
- Launched July 2026 with no payout history and no independent track record to check
- Unregulated and fully simulated, with no client-money protections
- The 90% split is a paid checkout add-on at +20% of the fee, not earned by scaling or performance
- Sprint Turbo pairs the cheapest entry with the tightest floor on the ladder, a 3% static maximum loss
- Match-Trader only, with no MT4, MT5 or cTrader
- Hedging is prohibited across your own accounts as well as within one
- Swiss-registered CFD/forex prop firm (Alpine Funded GmbH, Cham) trading simulated capital — unregulated
- The binding Terms state Alpine Funded is not the funding provider — an unnamed third party decides funding and payouts
- The Peak: 80% base rising to 90% through scaling — earned, not sold. Unlimited time; fee refunded with your third payout
- Base Camp’s advertised “up to 100% split” is a fixed dollar cap — about 20% effective at Level 1
- Whether the trailing drawdown ever locks is not published anywhere; the news rule can breach you via a stop-loss
★★★★★
More details +Alpine Funded Review 2026
Alpine Funded GmbH is Swiss-registered (CHE-159.158.124) but unregulated, and its accounts are simulated - which its Terms state plainly. There is a lot to like: The Peak's 90% split is EARNED through scaling rather than sold, the challenge period is unlimited, the fee is refundable with your third payout, and there is no consistency rule on either main line. The Alpine Pass is a genuinely novel idea where a mistake costs you a payout tier rather than your account. What gives pause is the distance between the sales pages and the contract: clause 9.2 states Alpine Funded IS NOT THE FUNDING PROVIDER - an unnamed third party decides whether you are funded and paid - while the homepage advertises instant funding and guaranteed payouts. Base Camp's "up to 100% split" is really a fixed dollar cap worth about 20% at Level 1.PROS:
- The Peak's 90% split is earned through the scaling plan, not sold as a paid add-on
- Swiss-registered entity - a step up from the offshore shells common in this sector
- Unlimited challenge period; Peak fee refundable with your third payout
- No consistency rule on Base Camp or Peak
- The Terms say "simulated" plainly, and so does the homepage CTA
- Base Camp payout tables are published in unusually concrete dollar detail
- The Alpine Pass model has no hard breaches - a mistake demotes your payout tier rather than closing the account
CONS:
- The binding Terms state Alpine Funded is NOT the funding provider - an unnamed third party has complete discretion over funding and payouts, and Alpine disclaims liability
- Base Camp's advertised "up to 100% profit split" is a fixed dollar cap - roughly 20% effective at Level 1
- The news rule is a hard breach even if triggered automatically - a stop-loss filling in the window can end the account
- Peak's payout cap destroys profit above 10% of balance or $10,000, whichever is lower
- Base Camp withholds your first two payouts until the third, unless you buy the On-Demand add-on