FXIFY Reports $37,624.97 in Top Weekly Payouts for October 26 to 30, With One $100K Account Taking $18,408.11
FXIFY has published a leaderboard of its five biggest trader payouts for the week of October 26 to 30, and the figures add up to $37,624.97. According to the firm’s announcement, as reported by Forex Prop Reviews, the top withdrawal was $18,408.11 from a $100K funded account. For traders weighing which firm to buy a challenge from, a payout leaderboard is one of the few public signals of money actually leaving a firm, so it deserves a careful read rather than a quick glance at the headline number.
What FXIFY Says It Paid Out
The five payouts, in the order the firm listed them, were $18,408.11 from a $100K account, $5,429.23 from a $100K account, $5,160.60 from a $50K account, $4,500.00 from a second $100K account and $4,127.03 from a third $100K account. JoinProp added the five figures together and arrived at $37,624.97, which matches the total the firm quoted. That addition is JoinProp’s own check and not something the firm separately published.
The payouts cover a five day window, October 26 to 30. The firm presented them as its top weekly results, which means these are the largest withdrawals it chose to feature, not every payout it processed that week. The announcement does not say how many payouts were made in total, so there is no way to work out what share of the week these five represent.
How the Money Is Distributed
Four of the five featured accounts were $100K accounts and one was $50K. JoinProp’s own calculation shows the single biggest payout accounts for roughly 49 percent of the five-payout total, and it is about 3.4 times the second largest. Strip it out and the other four average about $4,804, again by JoinProp’s own arithmetic.
That spread is worth keeping in mind. One outsized withdrawal lifts the headline, while the typical featured payout sits between about $4,100 and $5,400. A trader reading the leaderboard should treat the $18,408.11 figure as an outlier among selected winners, not as a benchmark for what a funded account usually produces.
The firm has not said what each trader’s profit split was, whether the amounts shown are before or after that split, or how long each account had been funded before the withdrawal. Those details change how the numbers should be read, and none of them were part of the announcement as reported.
The Programs Behind the Payouts
FXIFY sells several routes to a funded account, including one-phase, two-phase and three-phase evaluations, a Lightning Evaluation and Instant Funding. Its standard profit split starts at 80 percent and can reach 90 percent through eligible options, according to the report, and several evaluation-based funded accounts offer an on-demand first payout. Later withdrawal schedules depend on the program and the add-ons a trader selects.
The announcement does not say which program each of the five traders used. That matters, because an instant account and a three-phase account carry different costs, different rules and different timelines to a first withdrawal. If you want to compare routes before buying, our academy guide to 12 prop firm challenges compared lays out how the main models differ.
Why Payout Leaderboards Exist, and How to Read Them
Firms publish payout proof for a clear commercial reason. Visible withdrawals reassure prospective buyers and give existing funded traders a reason to stay active. That does not make the figures false, but it does mean the selection is made by the party that benefits from the story.
A useful habit is to ask what is missing. There is no failure rate, no count of traders who attempted the evaluation that week, and no information about how many funded traders withdrew nothing. A leaderboard answers the question of whether a firm pays, which is valuable, but not the question of how likely any single trader is to be paid. For a realistic view of earnings, read our academy piece on how much you can make with a prop firm in 2026.
Rules still decide outcomes. Evaluation requirements, minimum trading days, drawdown limits and consistency conditions determine who reaches a payout at all, so check them on the firm’s own pages before relying on any leaderboard. Our guide to whether prop firms are scams covers the checks worth making.
What This Means for the Broader Prop Industry
Weekly payout announcements have become a standard marketing tool across the sector, with firms competing to show the largest or most frequent withdrawals. For traders this is a mixed development. More public payout data is better than none, and it lets people compare firms on evidence of payment rather than promises.
The weakness is that each firm chooses what to show, in its own format, over its own time window. Until firms report payouts in a consistent way, including totals, counts and the share of funded accounts that withdraw, leaderboards will remain proof of intent to pay and not a measure of trader outcomes. In the meantime, comparing firms side by side, as on our FundedNext and The5%ers review pages, is a sensible way to weigh the evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions About This Story
Enjoyed this article? Add JoinProp as a preferred source on Google.
