FTMO - Prop Firm Review
Published: · Last updated:
- The best-known firm in the sector; simulated capital; unregulated
- 2-Step max drawdown is STATIC – a genuine fixed floor
- The 2-Step fee is refunded 100% with your first payout; the 1-Step never is
- The 1-Step carries a Best Day rule that nothing warns you about
- Includes the June 2026 payout report
Last reviewed: 12 July 2026. Checked against FTMO’s official terms, help centre and pricing pages.
Table of contents
- TL;DR: FTMO in 30 seconds
- Firm Overview
- June 2026 Payout Report New
- The Fee Refund - and Why the 1-Step Actually Costs More
- The Two Challenges Compared
- The 1-Step's Best Day Rule - the Trap Nothing Warns You About
- The 1-Step Payout Trap
- Profit Split and the Scaling Plan
- Payouts
- Trading Conditions and Restrictions
TL;DR: FTMO in 30 seconds
- What it is: the best-known firm in the sector, trading simulated capital. Unregulated.
- The split: up to 90%.
- The drawdown: the 2-Step max drawdown is STATIC - a genuine fixed floor.
- The catch: the 2-Step fee is refunded 100% with your first payout; the 1-Step never is - so the cheaper-looking option costs more. The 1-Step also carries a Best Day rule that nothing warns you about.
- Cost: one-time fee, fully refunded on the 2-Step. One of the only genuine full refunds in the industry.
- Best for: almost everyone should take the 2-Step here - static drawdown and a real refund.
Firm Overview
FTMO is the sector’s most established simulated-funding firm, operating from Prague through FTMO s.r.o. (Business ID 031 36 752) alongside FTMO Evaluation Global s.r.o. and FTMO Trading Global s.r.o.
It is not regulated, and it does not pretend to be. Its own site states that FTMO “only provides services of simulated trading… FTMO companies do not act as a broker and do not accept any deposits.” We looked for a false or implied regulatory claim and found none - which, in this industry, is worth saying out loud.
There are two products: the long-standing 2-Step Challenge and a newer 1-Step Challenge. They look like two prices for the same thing. They are not. The differences are substantial, they all run in the same direction, and the cheaper one is the worse deal.
Real trader reviews - FTMO6 real trader reviews for FTMO
Kyriakos Kampourakis
Consultant and foreign exchange trader based on Kos, Greece, who trades with FTMO and studied at UCLan Cyprus. He shared his first hand experience of the firm for JoinProp readers.
LinkedIn profileI really like FTMO and have had a very positive experience with the firm. I find them to be very straightforward, and their rules are clear and easy to understand, which makes the overall experience much smoother.
Honestly, there isn't really anything I would change about FTMO. I've been satisfied with the firm since day one, and I appreciate how transparent and easy to work with they have been throughout my experience.
Hamza El Missouri
Trader based in Rabat, Morocco, who studied at Universite Mohammed V de Rabat and trades with FTMO. He shared his experience of being paid out by the firm for JoinProp readers.
LinkedIn profileIn reality, I am very happy to be rewarded by the company FTMO for all the profits I have been able to achieve, and this within a short time and in accordance with what is stipulated in the contract. To this end, I want to thank the FTMO team firstly for their support and for their transparent and reliable services. What I also love is their permission to do swing trading, which suits my profile very well, as well as the trader dashboards to track the key metrics of the trader's performance. From my own experience, this is, for me, the best prop firm.
In reality, FTMO employs a static drawdown set at 10% of the initial balance; this provides traders with more breathing room, simplifies risk management, and helps protect their mindset from stress. In contrast, some other prop firms use a trailing drawdown based on the peak profit level, which complicates risk management and places greater stress on traders.
Vedanta Indalkar
Intraday trader based in Mumbai, India, and a biotechnology graduate of MIT World Peace University. He has traded with both FTMO and FundingPips, and compared the two for JoinProp readers.
LinkedIn profileSolid experience overall, payouts always came through on time. It is the most trusted in the industry and used worldwide with very less problems and hidden rules.

Josep Pintat Balta
Funded FX trader based in Andorra, focused on risk management and market analysis, who studied at the University of California, Berkeley. He trades with FTMO and shared his experience of the firm for JoinProp readers.
LinkedIn profileMy experience with FTMO has been very positive. In my opinion, it is one of the most trustworthy and professional prop firms in the market. I have always received my payouts on time and without any issues, which is one of the most important factors for me when choosing a prop firm.
Another strong point is that their rules are very clear and transparent. You know exactly what is expected from you as a trader, which gives me confidence when trading with them.
If I had to mention one area for improvement, it would be the response time of the chat support. It could sometimes be a little faster, although I have noticed that they have improved this recently. Overall, I am very satisfied with my experience with FTMO and would definitely recommend them.
Giorgio Geloso
Founder of Kairos Capital in Palermo, Sicily, working on quantitative strategies and alternative investments. He has traded with several CFD prop firms and compared them for JoinProp readers.
LinkedIn profileMy experience has been excellent: straightforward rules, a professional process, and most importantly, payouts have always been delivered as expected.
Khandakar Amin
Proprietary firm trader and mentor based in Dhaka, Bangladesh, who also works in organic SEO and studied at the University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh. He has traded with FTMO, WeMasterTrade and AudaCity Capital.
LinkedIn profileMy experience with FTMO has been very positive, they have a professional environment, clear processes, and overall I have had a good experience trading with them.
June 2026 Payout Report New
| Metric | June 2026 |
|---|---|
| Total paid to traders | $18.9 million |
| Rewards processed | 8,300+ |
| Average per reward | approx. $2,277 |
On these figures: payout data is self-reported by FTMO and is not independently audited. FTMO does, however, have the longest and most consistent public reporting record in the sector, publishing monthly totals with country-level detail rather than occasional milestone announcements. A firm that reports every month builds a series that can be checked against itself.
The Fee Refund - and Why the 1-Step Actually Costs More
This is the most important fact on this page, and most reviews get it backwards.
CFD pricing
FTMO 2-Step
| Account size | Price | Billing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10K | EUR 89 | One-time | Fee refundable 100% with first payout. |
| $25K | EUR 250 | One-time | Fee refundable 100% with first payout. |
| $50K | EUR 345 | One-time | Fee refundable 100% with first payout. |
| $100K | EUR 540 | One-time | Fee refundable 100% with first payout. |
| $200K | EUR 1080 | One-time | Fee refundable 100% with first payout. |
FTMO 1-Step
| Account size | Price | Billing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10K | EUR 79 | One-time | Fee not refunded. |
| $25K | EUR 199 | One-time | Fee not refunded. |
| $50K | EUR 319 | One-time | Fee not refunded. |
| $100K | EUR 499 | One-time | Fee not refunded. |
| $200K | EUR 999 | One-time | Fee not refunded. |
Pricing last verified: 2026-08-09
TFTTrader9867973Use code TFTTrader9867973 for the listed JoinProp reader discount at FTMO.
FTMO’s own FAQ is unambiguous: “FTMO Challenge: 1-Step - The entry fee is not refunded. FTMO Challenge: 2-Step - The entry fee may be refunded with the first Reward withdrawal.” Their pricing table even labels the two columns differently - “One-time refundable fee” against “One-time fee (non-refundable)”.
So the 1-Step’s lower sticker price is an illusion. On a 100,000 USD account:
| Route to funded (100K) | 2-Step | 1-Step |
|---|---|---|
| Pass first time | Pay €540, refunded in full → net €0 | Pay €499 → net €499 |
| Pass on the third attempt | €1,620 paid, €540 refunded → net €1,080 | €1,497 paid, nothing refunded → net €1,497 |
At every level of failure, the “cheaper” 1-Step is the more expensive product. Pass first time and the 2-Step is, in net terms, free.
And note there is no reset product. Fail and you repurchase at full price: “Each FTMO Challenge must be traded from the beginning, regardless of whether you have successfully completed one in the past.” Most competitors sell a discounted reset. FTMO does not, so every attempt is a fresh full-price purchase - which is exactly why the refund matters so much.
The Two Challenges Compared
| Rule | 2-Step | 1-Step |
|---|---|---|
| Profit target | 10% then 5% | 10% |
| Max daily loss | 5% | 3% |
| Max loss | 10% | 10% |
| Max loss type | STATIC - the floor never moves | END-OF-DAY TRAILING |
| Minimum trading days | 4 per phase | None |
| Time limit | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Best Day Rule | - | 50% |
| Profit split | 80%, rising to 90% | 90% from day one |
| Scaling Plan | Yes | None |
| Swing account | Yes | No |
| Fee refund | 100% | None |
Both drawdowns are measured on equity - balance plus open profit and loss, adjusted for swaps and commissions - and recalculated at midnight CE(S)T. The 2-Step’s static 10% floor is one of the more trader-friendly structures available anywhere.
Consistency rules: there are none on the 2-Step. FTMO: “Provided you maintain sustainable risk management practices, there are no additional consistency requirements.” In a sector where consistency rules routinely gate payouts at 15-40%, that absence is a genuine competitive advantage and is rarely credited.
The 1-Step’s Best Day Rule - the Trap Nothing Warns You About
The 1-Step carries a rule the 2-Step does not: your best single day must not exceed 50% of your total profit from profitable days. (Positive Days’ Profit means the sum of closed profit on winning days only - losing days are not netted off.)
Crucially, it is not a breach. Nothing fails and nothing is flagged. It simply blocks your pass or your payout until you have ground out more profit. FTMO’s own worked example: a 10,000 USD best day against 16,000 USD of positive-day profit is 62.5% - over the limit. To clear it, you must lift your positive-day profit to 20,000 USD.
Now combine that with the fact that the 1-Step has no minimum trading days. A trader can hit the 10% target in two sessions, believe they have passed, and then discover they are stranded - forced to keep trading purely to dilute their own best day. It is the most common way people get stuck on this product, and it is the direct consequence of two features that are each individually marketed as advantages.
The 1-Step Payout Trap
One more, and it is severe. On the 1-Step, withdrawing a reward fully resets your trailing Maximum Loss Limit back to 90% of initial capital.
Every unit of buffer you built through weeks of disciplined trading is wiped the moment you take money out. You are handed back a fresh account with a fresh 10% floor beneath you. On the 2-Step, with its static drawdown, this does not happen at all.
Note also that on the 1-Step, rewards cannot be left on the account to compound - you cannot choose to roll profit into a bigger balance. On the 2-Step you can, with a 20 USD minimum.
Profit Split and the Scaling Plan
- 1-Step: a flat 90% from day one. It is not a paid add-on and nothing needs to be bought.
- 2-Step: 80% base, rising to 90% once Scaling Plan or Premium Programme conditions are met. Performance-gated and free - never a paid upgrade.
This is worth pausing on, because it is where FTMO differs from most of the field. Across the firms we audit, the advertised maximum split is very often something you buy at checkout. At FTMO it is something you earn, and it costs nothing.
The Scaling Plan is 2-Step only: +25% of account balance every 4 months, up to 2,000,000 USD. To qualify you need at least 4 months as an FTMO trader, 10% total net profit on your initial or scaled capital, at least two processed rewards, and a positive balance at the scale-up date. Scale-ups are requested during the withdrawal process, not granted automatically.
Maximum allocation is 400,000 USD per trader or strategy, counted across 1-Step and 2-Step combined, before any scaling. Running both products does not double your ceiling.
Payouts
- First payout: request on the 14th day (or any day after) following your first placed trade, with all positions closed. From then on it is on-demand - there is no fixed calendar cycle.
- Minimum: 20 USD closed profit by bank wire, 50 USD by crypto.
- No withdrawal commission whatsoever. FTMO: “FTMO does not charge any additional commissions for Reward withdrawals.” Set against firms that take 3.5% off every payout, this compounds into real money over a year.
- Methods: bank wire, Visa Direct / Mastercard Send (up to 20,000 USD), Skrill (up to 3,000 USD), and crypto.
- Speed: 1-2 business days to review the invoice, then typically 1-2 business days to pay.
Payouts are blocked to sanctioned regions and entities - including by crypto. If that could affect you, confirm before purchasing rather than after.
Trading Conditions and Restrictions
- Platforms: MT4, MT5 and cTrader. MT4/MT5 server time is GMT+2 with daylight saving.
- Instruments: forex, indices, commodities, stocks and crypto.
- Leverage: up to 1:100 on Standard accounts (it cannot be raised); 1:30 on Swing.
- Platform caps: 200 orders open at any one time, and a maximum of 2,000 positions per day.
- Commissions: FTMO markets “very low commissions” but does not publish a per-lot table, directing traders to the platform’s contract specification instead. We are not going to invent a number - check the spec in your terminal before you size up.
Standard vs Swing - the choice most people get wrong
News restrictions and overnight/weekend holding restrictions apply to Standard accounts only, and only once you are funded - not during the evaluation. This catches people out: they pass on a Standard account holding through news, then find they cannot do it on the funded account.
Swing accounts have neither restriction. If you hold through news events or over weekends, take Swing, accept 1:30 leverage instead of 1:100, and save yourself the problem. Swing is not available on the 1-Step - another quiet reason the 1-Step suits fewer people than it appears to.
How FTMO Compares
| FTMO 2-Step | FTMO 1-Step | The5ers High Stakes | Funding Pips | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fee (100K) | €540 | €499 | 491-545 USD | 520 USD |
| Fee refund | 100% | None | 70%, High Stakes only | At your 4th reward |
| Max drawdown | 10% static | 10% trailing | 10% static | 10% static |
| Split | 80→90% (free) | 90% flat | 80→100% (free) | 60-100% by payout cycle |
| Withdrawal fee | None | None | 3.5% | Crypto deductions |
| Consistency rule | None | 50% Best Day | 30-50% (undisclosed pre-purchase) | 35% on-demand only |
| Scaling | +25%/4mo → 2M USD | None | → 500K USD | Prime only |
| Reset available | No | No | No | Yes, at 90% of fee |
The honest read: on the numbers, the FTMO 2-Step is one of the strongest products in the sector - a full fee refund, a static drawdown, no consistency rule, no withdrawal commission, and a real scaling plan to 2 million. Its one genuine weakness is that failure is expensive, because there is no reset. The 1-Step is the mirror image: easier to enter, harder to keep, and it never returns your money.
Who FTMO Suits - and Who Should Avoid It
Take the 2-Step if you can. It is the better product on almost every axis that matters: static drawdown, full refund, scaling to 2 million, no consistency rule, and a Swing variant with no news or weekend restrictions. Pass first time and it costs you nothing at all.
Only take the 1-Step if 90% from day one genuinely matters more to you than everything else, and you are confident of passing quickly. Go in knowing the fee is gone forever, the drawdown trails, the Best Day Rule can strand you at the finish line, and every payout wipes your buffer.
Avoid FTMO if you expect to fail a few times cheaply. There is no reset product, so every attempt is a full-price purchase. If you want a firm that lets you retry at a discount, look elsewhere - and if you are a scalper who books one enormous day a month, the 1-Step’s Best Day Rule will hold your money for a long time.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the FTMO fee refunded?
On the 2-Step, yes - 100%, with your first reward withdrawal, returned via your original payment method. On the 1-Step, no, never. This is the opposite of what the lower 1-Step price implies.
Is the FTMO drawdown static or trailing?
The 2-Step is static - a 10% floor that never moves. The 1-Step trails on end-of-day balance and resets back to 90% of initial capital every time you take a payout.
What is the Best Day Rule?
A 1-Step-only rule: your best day must not exceed 50% of your profitable-day profit. It does not fail you; it blocks your pass or payout until you trade more. Because the 1-Step has no minimum trading days, traders regularly hit the target and then find themselves stuck.
Does FTMO have a consistency rule?
Not on the 2-Step. FTMO states there are no additional consistency requirements beyond the trading objectives. The 1-Step has the Best Day Rule.
Does FTMO charge to withdraw?
No, there is no withdrawal commission of any kind. The minimum is 20 USD by bank wire or 50 USD by crypto.
Can I reset a failed challenge?
No. There is no reset product - you buy a new challenge at full price and start from the beginning.
Should I choose Standard or Swing?
Swing, if you hold through news or over weekends - it has neither restriction, at the cost of lower leverage (1:30 vs 1:100). Note Swing is not offered on the 1-Step.
How large can my account get?
The allocation cap is 400,000 USD across both products combined. Beyond that, the 2-Step Scaling Plan grows the account by 25% every four months, up to 2,000,000 USD.
There are no reviews yet.