Prop Number One - Prop Firm Review

(1 customer review)
Add to wishlistAdded to wishlistRemoved from wishlist 2
7.2
Expert ScoreRead review
User Rating: Be the first one!
  • Dubai-based prop firm (founded 2024) with simulated forex/CFD challenges on five platforms; $7k–$300k
  • Signature: a 100% profit split plus an advertised monthly salary up to $3,000 — but gated by a “Gambling Rule”
  • Markets a link to Alvar Finance (Gibraltar-regulated broker) — the affiliated broker, not the prop firm
  • 2-step evaluation; 5% daily / 10% max drawdown; low asset-dependent leverage
  • Watch: 100%-plus-salary economics are hard to sustain, and payout denials are reported under the Gambling Rule

Prop Number One: the short version

  • What it is: a Dubai-based prop firm (founded 2024) offering simulated forex/CFD challenges on MT4/MT5, cTrader, DXtrade and Match-Trader. A 2-step evaluation, $7k to $300k.
  • The rule that defines it: an unusually generous headline package — a 100% profit split plus an advertised monthly “salary” of up to $3,000 — but gated by a “Gambling Rule” that can void an otherwise-earned payout.
  • The backing: it markets a link to Alvar Finance, a Gibraltar-regulated broker — that’s the affiliated broker, not the prop firm, which is itself unregulated.
  • Drawdown: 5% daily and 10% maximum (described as trailing in at least one source; not fully confirmed).
  • Payouts: minimum around $100–$150, every 21 days (or 7 with a paid add-on), after five funded trading days; up to 15% of account size per cycle.
  • Watch for: the 100%-split-plus-salary economics are hard to sustain, and there are payout-denial complaints under the Gambling Rule. Treat the headline generosity with healthy skepticism.

Last reviewed: 15 July 2026. Prop Number One’s site is script-rendered, so some details below are drawn from its indexed pages and detailed independent reviews rather than a live read of its Terms — confirm the specifics on the firm’s own pages before buying. This is a simulated-account firm.

7.2Expert Score
Prop Number One
Prop Number One leads with one of the most generous-looking offers in the sector, a 100% split plus an advertised monthly salary, on a broad platform line-up with low-cost, refundable challenges. Approach it with a clear head: the accounts are simulated and the firm is unregulated, the 100%-plus-salary economics are hard to sustain and imply the firm profits mainly from fees and failed accounts, and the rewards are gated by a discretionary Gambling Rule that has been used to deny payouts.
OVERALL SCORE
7.2
PROS
  • Generous headline package: advertised 100% split plus a monthly salary up to $3,000|Broad platform choice (MT4/MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader), EAs allowed|Low-cost, refundable-on-passing challenges from about $52|Wide range of account sizes ($7k to $300k)|Marketed link to a Gibraltar-regulated affiliated broker
CONS
  • Rewards gated by a discretionary Gambling Rule that has voided payouts|100%-plus-salary economics are hard to sustain; firm likely profits from fees and failed accounts|Accounts are simulated; the prop firm itself is unregulated|Reported 10-plus-day payout delays against fast-payout marketing|Young firm (2024) with a short track record; Terms are script-rendered and hard to verify

Company and regulation

Prop Number One is a Dubai-based prop firm founded in 2024. It is unregulated as a prop firm, and its products are challenge/evaluation accounts on virtual (simulated) capital — it advertises “up to $300,000 in virtual trading capital.” It markets a relationship with Alvar Finance, described as a broker regulated by the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission; that is the affiliated broker, and does not make the prop firm itself a regulated entity. Because the firm’s Terms page is script-rendered, we could not quote its exact disclaimer, so treat the corporate and rules detail below as drawn from its indexed pages and independent reviews.

The rule that defines it: big rewards, gated by a “Gambling Rule”

Prop Number One’s defining feature is how generous its headline package looks: a 100% profit split to the trader, layered with an advertised monthly “salary” of up to $3,000 for funded traders. That combination is rare, and it is the main reason the firm gets attention — but it is also the reason to be careful, because a firm that genuinely kept nothing of a trader’s profit would struggle to fund salaries, which implies the economics lean heavily on challenge fees and failed accounts.

The practical catch is a “Gambling Rule” enforced at payout. It functions as a discretionary risk/consistency gate: at least one public complaint describes a $100k funded account having a $4,498 payout refused for allegedly violating this rule through excessive leverage or margin use. In other words, the standout rewards sit behind a rule that can void a payout you thought you had earned. That doesn’t make the firm a scam — many traders report being paid — but it does mean the headline “100% + salary” should be read alongside a real, discretionary payout gate. Understand exactly how the Gambling Rule is defined before you rely on those rewards.

Products, split and drawdown

Prop Number One runs a 2-step evaluation (broadly a 5% then 8% target) into a funded phase, sometimes framed as a three-tier “Junior / Senior / Top Trader” path. Account sizes are $7k, $17k, $27k, $50k, $100k, $200k and $300k. Markets are forex, crypto, indices and commodities/metals as CFDs, on MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade and Match-Trader, with EAs allowed. Leverage is notably low and asset-dependent (forex around 1:50, metals 1:25, indices 1:10).

The advertised split is a flat 100%. Drawdown is a 5% daily loss and 10% maximum, described as trailing/relative in at least one review (we could not confirm static-vs-trailing from a primary page). Fees are one-time and refundable on passing (roughly $52 on the $7k up to ~$1,592 on the $300k).

Payouts

Payouts have a minimum of about $100–$150 (sources differ), run every 21 days by default or every 7 with a paid “fast withdrawal” add-on, and require five funded trading days. There is a withdrawal cap of up to 15% of account size per 21-day cycle, and no stated withdrawal fees. Alongside the Gambling Rule, note that some independent complaints cite 10-plus-day delays against the “fast payout” marketing, so treat advertised speeds as a best case.

Verdict

Prop Number One leads with one of the most generous-looking offers in the sector — a 100% split plus an advertised monthly salary — on a broad platform line-up with low-cost, refundable challenges. For traders drawn to those headline rewards, it is understandably eye-catching.

Approach it with a clear head. The accounts are simulated and the firm is unregulated (the regulated entity is its affiliated broker, not the prop firm); the 100%-plus-salary economics are hard to sustain and imply the firm profits mainly from fees and failed accounts; and the standout rewards are gated by a discretionary “Gambling Rule” that has been used to deny payouts. It’s a young firm (2024) with a short track record. If the offer appeals, start small, get the exact Gambling-Rule definition in writing, keep your risk conservative, and treat the salary and 100% split as best-case rather than guaranteed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Prop Number One regulated, and is the capital real?

Prop Number One is a Dubai-based prop firm founded in 2024 and is unregulated. Its products are challenge accounts on virtual, simulated capital, advertised as up to $300,000 in virtual trading capital. It markets a link to Alvar Finance, a Gibraltar-regulated broker, but that is the affiliated broker rather than the prop firm, so the prop product itself is not regulated.

What is the Prop Number One 100% split and salary offer?

Prop Number One advertises a 100 percent profit split to the trader plus a monthly salary of up to $3,000 for funded traders, an unusually generous headline package. Because a firm keeping none of a trader profit would struggle to fund salaries, the economics likely rely heavily on challenge fees and failed accounts, so treat these rewards as best-case rather than guaranteed.

What is the Prop Number One Gambling Rule?

It is a discretionary risk or consistency gate enforced at payout. At least one public complaint describes a $100k funded account having a roughly $4,498 payout refused for allegedly violating the rule through excessive leverage or margin use. In effect, the headline rewards sit behind a rule that can void an otherwise-earned payout, so confirm exactly how it is defined before relying on those rewards.

What are the Prop Number One account sizes and drawdown rules?

It runs a 2-step evaluation into a funded phase, with account sizes of $7k, $17k, $27k, $50k, $100k, $200k and $300k. Drawdown is a 5 percent daily loss and a 10 percent maximum, described as trailing in at least one review, though we could not confirm static versus trailing from a primary page. Leverage is low and asset-dependent, around 1:50 on forex.

How do Prop Number One payouts work?

The minimum payout is around $100 to $150, payouts run every 21 days by default or every 7 with a paid fast-withdrawal add-on, and you need five funded trading days. There is a withdrawal cap of up to 15 percent of account size per 21-day cycle. Note that some independent complaints cite 10-plus-day delays against the fast-payout marketing, so treat advertised speeds as a best case.

Does Prop Number One charge a monthly fee?

No. It charges a one-time challenge fee that is refundable on passing, ranging from around $52 on the $7k account up to about $1,592 on the $300k. There is no monthly subscription, though a faster 7-day payout cycle is available as a paid add-on. As a 2024 firm it has a relatively short track record, so start small and confirm current terms directly.

Visit Prop Number One →

1 review for Prop Number One - Prop Firm Review

5.0 out of 5
1
0
0
0
0
Write a review
Show all Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating
  1. Sophie W.

    IEIreland

    6.5/10 honestly. its fine. its not amazing its not terrible. payouts came thru but slower than advertised (like 4 days when they said 2). rules were clear. i’d use them again but im not gonna be shouting from the rooftops about it

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this

    Add a review

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *