FTMO vs Funding Traders: Elite Prop Firms Comparison

Published: · Last updated:

Introduction

FTMO and Funding traders stand among the industry’s leading prop trading firms, offering traders access to substantial capital without personal financial risk. FTMO, established in Prague, has built a stellar reputation with consistent payouts and innovative trader support systems, with Trustpilot data not pinned in this JoinProp review (defer to direct check). Funding traders, a newer but rapidly growing competitor, offers competitive funding options with flexible trading conditions and has gained popularity for its straightforward evaluation process, with its Trustpilot rating currently unavailable (guidelines breach) – 3,302 reviews on file. Both firms have proven track records of empowering traders to access professional capital, but they differ significantly in their program structures, evaluation criteria, and profit-sharing models.

FeatureFTMOFunding Traders - Elite Firm Review
FTMO Funding Traders - Elite Firm Review
Founded20152019
Profit Split80-90% (2-Step); 90% flat (1-Step)80-90%
Maximum Account Size$2,000,000$1,000,000
Evaluation Phases22
Trustpilot Rating4.8/5 (43,791 reviews)
Expert Grade9.18.5
ProgramFTMOFunding Traders - Elite Firm Review
Entry Level ProgramYesYes
Advanced ProgramFTMO Challenge + VerificationYes
Scaling OptionsYesYes
Demo AccountNoYes
CriteriaFTMOFunding Traders - Elite Firm Review
Profit Target10% then 5% (2-Step); 10% (1-Step)5-12%
Maximum Drawdown10% static (2-Step); 10% trailing (1-Step)8-10%
Minimum Trading Days4 per phase (2-Step); none (1-Step)10
News TradingRestricted on Standard; unrestricted on SwingYes
OptionFTMOFunding Traders - Elite Firm Review
$10K AccountEUR 89 / FTMO 2-Step / One-timeUSD 119 / Listed challenge / One-time
$25K AccountEUR 250 / FTMO 2-Step / One-timeUSD 229 / Listed challenge / One-time
$50K AccountEUR 345 / FTMO 2-Step / One-timeUSD 339 / Listed challenge / One-time
$100K AccountEUR 540 / FTMO 2-Step / One-timeUSD 599 / Listed challenge / One-time
$200K AccountEUR 1080 / FTMO 2-Step / One-timeUSD 999 / Listed challenge / One-time
Coupons / DiscountFTMO discountFunding Traders - Elite Firm Review discount
FeatureFTMOFunding Traders - Elite Firm Review
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTraderDXTrade, TradeLocker, MetaTrader 5
ForexYesYes
StocksYesNo
IndicesYesYes
CommoditiesYesYes
CryptocurrenciesYesYes
BondsAvailable
EA/Algo TradingYesNo
FeatureFTMOFunding Traders - Elite Firm Review
Payout TermsBi-weekly via bank transfer, e-wallets, wire transfer, cryptocurrenciesBank Wire Transfer, PayPal, Skrill, Cryptocurrency, Wise
See all prop firm payouts →
Key ElementFTMOFunding Traders - Elite Firm Review
StrengthsFull fee refund on 2-Step; static drawdown; no consistency rules; zero withdrawal commission; scaling to $2Mreasonable challenge requirements, trader-friendly policies, transparent fee structure, multiple challenge options, scaling program
WeaknessesNo reset product; 1-Step fee never refunded; 50% Best Day Rule blocks payouts; 1-Step payout resets bufferexcessive fees, strict trading rules, high profit targets, capital loss risk, slow withdrawals
Best For2-Step recommended for most; 1-Step only if 90% split outweighs other concernsnew and experienced traders

FAQ

What makes FTMO popular among users?

FTMO has gained popularity primarily due to its established track record of consistent payouts, transparent evaluation process, and comprehensive trader support ecosystem. Traders particularly value their advanced performance dashboard that provides detailed analytics on trading behavior. The refundable fee structure is also highly appreciated, as successful traders can recoup their initial investment. Additionally, FTMO’s scaling program allows traders to increase their account size as they demonstrate consistent profitability, creating a clear growth path for professional development.

How does Funding traders differ from other similar organizations?

Funding traders distinguishes itself by offering a higher profit split (85%) than many competitors, including FTMO. They also provide more flexible trading conditions, including weekend position holding across all account types and fewer restrictions on news trading. Their Express Program, featuring a single-phase evaluation with a higher profit target but faster path to funding, offers an alternative to the traditional two-phase approach used by most prop firms. Additionally, Funding traders has positioned itself with competitive pricing that’s often lower than established competitors.

Which firm provides better chances of passing the evaluation process?

This depends largely on your trading style. FTMO’s two-phase process with 10% and 5% targets spread across more required trading days (minimum 4 per phase) allows for a more methodical approach with less pressure for daily returns. Funding traders offers both a traditional path and their Express option, which may suit aggressive traders who can hit a 12% target quickly. Overall, FTMO’s slightly more generous maximum drawdown limits (5% daily vs 4% at Funding traders) may give traders more breathing room, but Funding traders’ weekend position holding allowance benefits swing traders significantly. Success rates published by both companies show similar pass percentages around 25-30% for their evaluation phases.

How fast can I expect payouts from FTMO vs Funding traders?

FTMO processes withdrawals on a bi-weekly basis after the first month, with funds typically reaching traders’ accounts within 1-4 business days after processing. Their established payment system has a strong track record for reliability. Funding traders operates on a monthly withdrawal cycle, with payments processed during the first week of each month for the previous month’s profits. Their payment processing typically takes 2-5 business days. Both firms support multiple withdrawal methods including bank transfers and various e-wallets, though FTMO offers slightly more options for international traders.

Are there hidden fees or costs with either company?

Both FTMO and Funding traders are generally transparent about their fee structures. FTMO charges a one-time registration fee that is refundable upon successful completion of both evaluation phases. They do not charge monthly subscription fees for funded accounts, and there are no hidden costs for withdrawals or account maintenance. Funding traders also uses a one-time fee model but does not offer refunds on evaluation fees. Neither company charges for scaling up account sizes based on performance. The only potential additional costs would be if you needed to restart an evaluation after failing to meet targets, which would require paying the initial fee again with either company.

How was this 2 companies Comparison Created?

1. We Collect

Our team gathered comprehensive data from multiple sources to ensure accuracy and completeness. We analyzed the official websites of both FTMO and Funding traders to understand their current offerings, fee structures, and program specifics. We examined hundreds of verified customer reviews across platforms including Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army, and Reddit to understand real user experiences. Additionally, we consulted with active traders using both platforms and industry experts to gain insider perspectives on the strengths and limitations of each service.

2. We Examine

All collected information underwent thorough verification and analysis by our team of trading professionals with direct experience using funded trader programs. We compared stated policies against actual user experiences to identify any discrepancies. Our financial analysts evaluated the fee structures and profit-sharing models to determine true value propositions. We also conducted performance testing of both platforms to verify claims about execution speed, slippage, and platform reliability. This multi-layered examination process ensured that our comparisons reflect the actual experience traders can expect.

3. We Score

Our scoring methodology evaluates both companies across ten key categories: reputation/trustworthiness, program structure, passing criteria difficulty, fee/cost value, platform quality, available markets, technical performance, customer support, educational resources, and scaling opportunities. Each category receives a weighted score based on its importance to the average trader. These scores are combined to create our final ratings, with additional consideration given to unique features that may benefit specific trader types. This balanced approach ensures our final recommendations account for different trading styles and priorities.

4. You Choose

Use this comparison as a starting point for your decision, focusing on the factors most relevant to your trading style and goals. Consider your experience level, preferred trading instruments, and capital requirements when evaluating which program better suits your needs. We recommend taking advantage of any free trials or demo accounts before committing. Remember that successful prop firm trading requires not just selecting the right program, but also having a robust trading strategy and proper risk management. The best choice is ultimately the one that aligns with your personal trading approach and career objectives.

View More Elite Prop Firms Compared: Crypto Fund Trader vs E8 Markets

JoinProp FTMO and Funding traders stand among the industry’s leading prop trading firms, offering traders access to substantial capital without personal financial risk. FTMO, established in Prague, has built a stellar reputation with consistent payouts and innovative trader support systems, with Trustpilot data not pinned in this JoinProp review (defer to direct check). Funding traders, a newer but rapidly growing competitor, offers competitive funding options with flexible trading conditions and has gained popularity for its straightforward evaluation process, with its Trustpilot rating currently unavailable (guidelines breach) - 3,302 reviews on file. Both firms have proven track records of empowering traders to access professional capital, but they differ significantly in their program structures, evaluation criteria, and profit-sharing models.