Quick answer
FundingPips, Topstep and The5ers offer different alternatives to FTMO: CFD evaluation models, a futures evaluation-to-funded pathway, and Growth, High Stakes or Bootcamp evaluations respectively. Hyper Growth is a one-step challenge, not an evaluation-free account. Compare named programmes and current rulebooks; payout eligibility is separate from processing speed.
Key takeaways
- FundingPips evaluation models have static maximum loss limits; Zero has a 5% trailing limit and stricter holding rules.
- Topstep’s Trading Combine and Express Funded Account are simulated; a Live Funded Account is a later stage.
- The5ers Growth is a one-step evaluation. Scaling and payout conditions depend on the selected Growth variant.
- Review current reward conditions rather than assuming any firm is universally fastest.
On this page
- #1: FundingPips – Compare the Model and Reward Terms
- #2: Topstep – Futures and Funded Account Stages
- #3: The5ers – One-Step Growth and Scaling
- Side-by-Side Comparison: Which Firm Fits Your Trading Style?
- Key Takeaways
- Conclusion: Finding Your FTMO Alternative
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Key Terms Glossary
- Frequently Asked Questions
FTMO is one of several providers traders compare for evaluation and funded-account programs. Many funded traders seek out these other options due to FTMO’s specific rules, pricing models, or payout structures that may not align with their individual strategies.
This comparison by JoinProp delves into three prominent alternatives: FundingPips, Topstep, and The 5%ers. We will analyze their challenge structures, cost-to-value propositions, payout consistency, and overall trustworthiness, providing a definitive guide for traders looking to diversify their funding sources beyond the established giant.

#1: FundingPips – Compare the Model and Reward Terms
FundingPips offers five programmes: 1-Step Flex, 2-Step Standard, 2-Step Pro, 2-Step Flex and Zero. Evaluation models use static maximum loss limits; Zero uses a 5% trailing limit. Trailing drawdown is not inherently more flexible for swing trading.
- Standard: 8% then 5% targets; 3% or 5% daily, depending on configuration, and 10% static maximum loss; normally three days per phase, waived with the 3% daily-loss add-on. List price: $66 for $10K or $544 for $100K.
- Pro: 6% then 6% targets; 3% daily and 6% static maximum loss; minimum-day wording is inconsistent: current headings say zero, while August 26 notes retain one or two days by account vintage. Confirm your dashboard requirement. List price: $29 for $5K or $422 for $100K.
- Standard weekly rewards pay 60%; Pro weekly rewards pay 80%. Standard also offers 80% biweekly and 90% on-demand, subject to its consistency and minimum-reward conditions.
The 100% monthly option on eligible evaluation models purchased on or after August 15, 2026 requires 30 days, a 35% consistency score and seven profitable days of at least 0.5% each; a 1% Striking System warning trigger applies. It is not a scaling tier.
Deliberate news trading is prohibited in evaluation and Master accounts. Standard-model Master restrictions apply five minutes before and after high-impact releases and ten minutes before speech starts and after speech ends; a trade opened at least five hours earlier may qualify for an exception. Zero prohibits holding within its stricter news window. Evaluation overnight/weekend holding is permitted. On the named evaluation models’ Master accounts, overnight/weekend holding requires the Swing add-on; otherwise daily auto-close applies. Zero weekend holding remains a hard breach.
Do not choose FundingPips on a blanket claim of unrestricted swing trading or guaranteed five-day payouts. Reward cycles start from the first Master trade; requests require eligibility and separate processing time. See FundingPips Standard rules, FundingPips Pro rules, FundingPips news and weekend rules and FundingPips reward methods (rules checked October 5, 2026; retained fee figures are not current checkout quotes).
#2: Topstep – Futures and Funded Account Stages
Topstep offers a futures pathway with three distinct stages: simulated Trading Combine, simulated Express Funded Account (XFA), and a Live Funded Account after selection by its Risk Team. Passing the Combine does not directly grant a live brokerage account. See the official program overview.
- Combine targets are $3,000, $6,000 and $9,000 for the $50K, $100K and $150K sizes. The current consistency target is 55%; exceeding it increases the profit needed to pass. Consistency rules.
- XFA maximum loss allowances are $2,000, $3,000 and $4,500 by size, based on end-of-day trailing balance. A daily limit is optional on current XFA paths. XFA parameters.
- XFA Standard requires five winning days of at least $150; Consistency requires three trading days and a best day no higher than 40% of net profit. Requests are normally limited to 50% of balance, with size-specific caps; optional-DLL terms can change caps.
- The normal trader share is 90%. The first-$10,000 100% provision applies only to eligible traders who joined before January 12, 2026. Live daily payout access requires 30 qualifying live winning days. Approval and transfer time are separate from eligibility. Payout policy.

#3: The5ers – One-Step Growth and Scaling
The5ers describes Growth as a one-step challenge. The evaluation is simulated; purchasing it does not provide withdrawable live capital. Its current page contains Pro Growth and Hyper Growth variants, so verify the selected variant rather than combining their rules.
- The published Growth objectives include a 10% target and 6% stop-out. Hyper Growth describes a 3% daily pause; Pro Growth uses a daily-loss rule.
- Hyper Growth advertises doubling at qualifying milestones and growth up to $4 million. This is conditional scaling, not the starting allocation.
- The page currently conflicts on minimum days: the plan card shows three profitable days, while explanatory text says no minimum for level 1. Confirm the purchased plan’s requirements and payout schedule.
- Starting share depends on the variant and stage. The displayed Growth table begins at 75%; “up to 100%” is a later conditional maximum.
Compare this evaluation with programs that actually skip evaluation. The distinction matters before paying a fee.

Side-by-Side Comparison: Which Firm Fits Your Trading Style?
Matching a prop firm to your unique trading style, risk tolerance, and capital requirements is crucial for long-term success. The following table provides a quick decision framework, highlighting key differences across FundingPips, Topstep, and The 5%ers.
Consider your preferred market, trading frequency, and comfort with different drawdown types when evaluating these alternatives.
| Comparison criteria | FundingPips | Topstep | The5ers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference fees retained from earlier edition (not verified checkout quotes) | $544 Standard / $422 Pro list price ($100K); promotions may differ | $99/month + $149 activation (Standard); legacy reference only | ~$620 (Hyper Growth); earlier reference, not a verified $100K starting offer |
| Evaluation structure | Model-specific evaluation; 30-day inactivity rule | Simulated Trading Combine, then simulated XFA; live selection later | Growth is a one-step challenge; selected variant matters |
| Daily loss | Standard 3% or 5% by configuration; Pro 3% | Optional for current XFA paths; Live has a required limit | Hyper Growth daily pause differs from Pro Growth daily-loss rule |
| Trader share | Standard 60% weekly / 80% biweekly / 90% on demand / eligible monthly 100% | 90%; eligible pre-January 12, 2026 traders retain the first-$10K exception | Variant and stage dependent; current Growth table starts at 75% |
| Payout eligibility | Cycle, minimum reward and consistency conditions apply | XFA Standard: 5 winning days; Consistency: 3 days plus 40% rule; caps apply | Confirm selected variant and stage; scaling target is not an immediate cash entitlement |
| Potential fit | CFD traders who match the exact model and holding restrictions | Futures traders comfortable with staged simulated/live progression | Traders seeking a Growth evaluation and conditional scaling |
| Ratings | Not reverified; see our review | No current rating asserted | No current rating asserted |
Program rules checked October 5, 2026 against the linked official sources. Prices above are retained historical references, not like-for-like current offers. Confirm checkout and the purchased account’s agreement.
JoinProp’s comparison tools can help you filter these and other firms by your specific criteria, allowing you to quickly evaluate which firm offers the best fit for your trading strategy and risk management approach. For instance, if you prioritize weekly payouts, FundingPips offers multiple flexible options.

The 3-Axis Firm Matcher Framework
To simplify your decision, consider the 3-Axis Firm Matcher Framework: Rule Flexibility vs Strictness, Evaluation Speed vs Rigor, and Market Focus. This framework helps map prop firms to your trading profile.
- Rule flexibility: Check daily and maximum loss, news restrictions and weekend holding for the exact account. FundingPips evaluation and Master rules differ; Zero has stricter holding conditions. FundingPips news and weekend rules.
- Evaluation structure: Separate the qualification stage from the reward-eligible stage. Growth and the Trading Combine both have evaluation objectives; neither is evaluation-free funding.
- Market focus: Compare the instruments in the named account. Topstep is futures-focused; the FundingPips and The5ers models discussed here are CFD-oriented.
By applying this framework, you can quickly identify which firm aligns best with your specific needs and avoid firms that clash with your inherent trading style.

Key Takeaways
- FundingPips offers several CFD models; compare loss limits, minimum days and reward eligibility before buying.
- Topstep separates simulated qualification, simulated funded trading and later live selection.
- The5ers Growth requires an evaluation; scaling is conditional on the selected plan’s milestones.
- All three firms offer distinct advantages over FTMO depending on a trader’s specific needs, profit split preferences, and risk tolerance.
- A published payout schedule does not guarantee that any particular account qualifies for payment.
- JoinProp’s comparison platform allows traders to filter and compare these firms to find the optimal match for their trading goals.
Conclusion: Finding Your FTMO Alternative
The prop trading landscape extends far beyond FTMO, offering a wealth of opportunities for funded traders. FundingPips, Topstep, and The 5%ers each present unique value propositions that cater to different trading styles and preferences.
Whether you prioritize FundingPips’ choice of CFD evaluation models, the specialized futures focus of Topstep, or the Growth evaluation and scaling options at The5ers, a suitable alternative exists. The “best” firm is always subjective, dependent on your individual strategy, capital, and risk profile.
JoinProp empowers traders to navigate this complex market by providing transparent, side-by-side comparisons of these and many other firms. Utilize our platform to filter by your specific criteria and discover the prop firm that truly aligns with your trading journey. Explore Funding Pips.
Related on JoinProp
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the best prop trading firms besides FTMO?
FundingPips, Topstep and The5ers are alternatives with different markets, evaluation structures and payout conditions. Suitability depends on the exact account and your strategy.
Is FundingPips better than FTMO for swing traders?
Not automatically. FundingPips permits evaluation weekend holding; the named evaluation models need the Swing add-on for overnight/weekend Master holding. Zero weekend holding remains a hard breach. Compare the purchased configuration with FTMO Swing.
How does Topstep compare to FTMO for futures traders?
Topstep has a dedicated futures offering. FTMO now also has a separate Futures service with Growth and Pro programs, in addition to its CFD 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations. Compare Topstep with the current FTMO Futures rules rather than using FTMO CFD objectives as a proxy for futures terms.
Is The5ers Hyper Growth an evaluation-free program?
No. The official Growth page describes a one-step challenge. Hyper Growth scaling follows qualifying milestones; it is not immediate access to withdrawable live capital. Confirm the selected Growth variant’s current terms.
Which prop firm has the fastest payouts after FTMO?
FundingPips Standard weekly and Pro use a seven-day reward cycle from the first Master trade, subject to eligibility. Processing is normally 1–3 working days plus transfer time. This does not establish a universal fastest firm.
Are FundingPips, Topstep, and The 5%ers legit prop firms?
Assess each firm’s contract, programme rules, jurisdiction and current trader evidence. Ratings alone do not guarantee reliability or payouts. Our FundingPips review explains its simulated trading service and reward conditions.
How much does it cost to get funded with FundingPips vs Topstep vs The 5%ers?
The earlier fee references retained here are FundingPips $544 Standard/$422 Pro, Topstep $99 per month plus $149 activation, and about $620 for The5ers Hyper Growth. These are not verified current checkout quotes or equivalent $100K starting products. Confirm account size, plan, add-ons and recurring fees before purchasing; existing discounts may apply.
What are the main rule differences between FTMO and these alternative prop firms?
Main rule differences include drawdown calculations (FundingPips evaluations use static maximum loss, while Zero uses a trailing limit), market focus (Topstep offers futures, while FTMO offers separate CFD and Futures services), and evaluation structure (The5ers Growth has a one-step evaluation, whereas FTMO CFD offers 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations and FTMO Futures has separate programs). Holding periods, daily loss limits, and profit splits also vary significantly. Explore The 5%ers.
Can I use JoinProp to compare these prop firms side by side?
Yes, JoinProp’s platform is specifically designed to compare prop firms side by side, allowing you to filter by specific rules, pricing models, payout terms, and trader reviews. This enables a comprehensive evaluation of FundingPips, Topstep, The 5%ers, and dozens of other firms to find the best fit for your trading strategy.
Which prop firm is best for traders who failed FTMO’s challenge?
For traders who failed FTMO’s challenge, the best alternative depends on why they failed. If strict rules were an issue, compare FundingPips’ exact model constraints before switching; its Master weekend restrictions may not suit swing trading. If forex wasn’t their strength, Topstep offers a dedicated futures environment. The5ers Growth still requires an evaluation, so it is not an option for skipping qualification entirely. JoinProp helps pinpoint the right firm based on these factors.
Key Terms Glossary
Prop Trading Firm: A firm whose program may involve simulated evaluation, simulated reward-eligible trading or live proprietary capital; identify the stage and contract.
Funded Account: An account described as funded may be simulated or live. Passing an evaluation does not by itself establish live execution. Explore FTMO legitimacy.
Trailing Drawdown: A loss threshold that follows a specified balance or equity high-water mark. Its starting floor, calculation and lock point depend on the program.
Static Drawdown: A fixed maximum loss limit calculated from the initial account balance, which does not change regardless of equity gains.
Trading Combine: Topstep’s simulated futures evaluation, followed by the simulated Express stage and possible later live selection.
Instant Funding: A program providing an account without a separate evaluation; that account may be simulated, and payout conditions still apply.
Profit Split: The percentage distribution of profits between the trader and the prop firm, typically favoring the trader.
Scaling Plan: A structured program by prop firms to increase a trader’s allocated capital based on consistent profitability and performance milestones.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FundingPips automatically better for swing traders?
Not automatically. FundingPips permits evaluation weekend holding; the named evaluation models need the Swing add-on for overnight/weekend Master holding. Zero weekend holding remains a hard breach. Compare the purchased configuration with FTMO Swing.
How does Topstep compare for futures trading?
Topstep offers futures programs. FTMO also offers separate Futures Growth and Pro programs, alongside its CFD 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations. Compare the current rules of the specific futures products.
Does The5ers Growth skip evaluation?
No. Growth is a one-step challenge. Scaling depends on the selected variant and its milestones; payment does not provide immediate withdrawable capital.
Which firm has the fastest payouts?
FundingPips Standard weekly and Pro use a seven-day reward cycle from the first Master trade, subject to eligibility. Processing is normally 1–3 working days plus transfer time. This does not establish a universal fastest firm.
Are these firms legitimate?
Assess the current contract, eligibility restrictions, account stages and recent evidence. Ratings and published payout schedules do not guarantee future payment.
Enjoyed this article? Add JoinProp as a preferred source on Google.