Leveraged Launches Nitro, a Direct Funding Program With No Evaluation or Consistency Rule, and Prices Its $100K Account at $899 With Code NITRO
Leveraged has launched Nitro, a direct funding program that skips the evaluation stage and drops the consistency rule, according to a Forex Prop Reviews report published on 6 November 2026. The reported launch pricing puts a $100,000 account at $899 with the code NITRO, against a displayed regular price of $999. For traders who have been weighing a cheap challenge against a pricier funded-from-day-one account, it is a notable new entry in a crowded November.
What Leveraged Says Nitro Includes
Per the report, Nitro offers account sizes from $10,000 to $100,000, with a reward share of up to 95%. There is no profit target to hit before the account goes live, and there is no consistency rule limiting how much of total profit can come from a single day. The $899 price for the largest size is attributed to the code NITRO, which the report says must be entered to get the advertised figure.
JoinProp has not tested the checkout, so we cannot say how the code behaves across sizes, whether the discount applies to every account tier, or how long the launch price lasts. The report does not name an end date for the promotion, and we are treating that as unconfirmed rather than assuming the offer is open-ended.
How Nitro Differs From the Rest of the Leveraged Lineup
The report says Leveraged already runs several evaluation-based products, including Turbo Trade, Sprint, One Challenge and its Classic challenges, plus a dedicated crypto challenge. Nitro is the first in that list described as skipping the evaluation entirely. That makes it a different kind of purchase: instead of paying a small fee for a chance at funding, the trader pays a larger up-front price for an account that is, on the firm’s description, funded from the start.
It is worth being precise about what that trade-off looks like. On the reported numbers, the $100,000 account at $899 is about 10% below the displayed $999 (JoinProp’s own calculation), and the buyer is paying for access, not for a guaranteed payout. Rewards still depend on trading results and on whatever loss limits the firm applies, which the report does not detail.
Why Dropping the Consistency Rule Matters
Consistency rules typically cap how much of a payout can come from the best trading day, which pushes traders to spread profit across more sessions. Removing that rule favours breakout, news-driven and high-conviction styles where one strong day can account for most of a month’s gain. Our guide to prop firm survival rates explains how often accounts fail from rule breaches rather than from poor trading, which is why the details of the remaining loss limits matter more than the headline.
Traders comparing structures can also see how this sits against evaluation-based programs in our comparison of prop firm challenges. A no-evaluation account removes one gate, but it does not remove the daily and overall drawdown rules that decide whether an account survives.
What Leveraged Has Not Confirmed
The public report leaves several practical questions open. It does not state the daily or overall loss limits on Nitro, the payout schedule, the minimum profit needed before a first withdrawal, or whether the 95% share is available from the first payout or only after a milestone. It also does not say whether the $10,000 to $100,000 range covers every size in between, or what the prices are below $100,000. Anyone considering the program should read the firm’s own rules page before paying, and should check price sheets such as our cheap prop firms guide for context.
What This Means for the Broader Prop Industry
Nitro is part of a visible shift toward products that sell speed and fewer rules instead of the lowest possible entry fee. Direct and instant funding programs have become a standard second tier at many firms, and the dropping of consistency rules is increasingly used as a headline differentiator. The open question is how firms protect themselves without those rules, usually through tighter drawdown limits, payout caps or scaling conditions that are easy to miss at checkout.
For traders, the practical lesson is to compare total cost and rule sets side by side, not the headline price alone. For the industry, a launch like this is a small but clear sign that firms are competing on structure as hard as they compete on discounts.
Frequently Asked Questions About This Story
Enjoyed this article? Add JoinProp as a preferred source on Google.
