OFP Funding vs FTMO: Comprehensive Comparison

Published: ยท Last updated:

Introduction

OFP Funding and FTMO are two prominent proprietary trading firms that provide traders with the opportunity to manage substantial capital without risking their own money. FTMO, established in 2015, has become one of the industry’s most recognized names, with a Trustpilot snapshot of 4.8/5 from 53,102 reviews (checked September 27, 2026). OFP Funding, a newer entrant to the prop trading space, has quickly gained traction with its flexible evaluation programs and trader-friendly conditions. Both firms offer evaluation challenges that test traders’ skills before granting them access to funded accounts, but they differ significantly in their assessment structures, profit splits, and overall trading conditions. This comprehensive comparison will help you determine which platform best aligns with your trading goals and experience level.

FeatureOFP FundingFTMO
OFP Funding FTMO
Founded20222015
Profit Split95
Maximum Account Size$300,000CFD: up to $2,000,000 through scaling. Futures: up to $450,000 across 3 Sim-Funded accounts
Evaluation Phases0CFD: 1 phase (1-Step), 2 phases (2-Step). Futures: Evaluation, then Sim-Funded, then invitation-only Live Funded
Trustpilot Rating3.6
Expert Grade8.39.1
ProgramOFP FundingFTMO
Entry Level ProgramYesYes. CFD 2-Step from EUR 89 one-time; Futures Growth from $119 per month
Advanced ProgramYesFTMO Challenge and Verification (CFD 2-Step); Futures Pro path with hard daily loss and 100% withdrawals
Scaling OptionsYes
Demo AccountNoFree Trials for 1-Step and 2-Step; practice only, not qualification. No free trial on Futures
CriteriaOFP FundingFTMO
Profit TargetNo
Maximum Drawdown10
Minimum Trading Days
News TradingYesEvaluation: allowed within trading rules. Standard FTMO Account: affected instruments restricted 2 minutes before/after selected releases; Swing exempt. Futures: news trading allowed
Daily Loss Limit
Drawdown Type
Time Limit
Consistency / Best Day Rule
Maximum Contracts
OptionOFP FundingFTMO
CFD $10K Account
CFD $25K Account
CFD $50K Account
CFD $100K Account
CFD $200K Account
Futures $50K Account
Futures $100K Account
Futures $150K Account
Refund PolicyNo
Coupons / DiscountOFP Funding discountFTMO discount
FeatureOFP FundingFTMO
Trading PlatformsMatch-Trader, cTrader, TradeLockerCFD: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView. Futures: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView
ForexYesYes
StocksNoYes
IndicesYesYes
CommoditiesYesYes
CryptocurrenciesYesYes
BondsNoNot verified for CFD accounts; check current Symbols
EA/Algo TradingYesAllowed subject to trading rules, allocation and platform limits; third-party EAs can create allocation conflicts.
FeatureOFP FundingFTMO
Payout TermsBi-weekly, first withdrawal after 4 daysCFD: request from day 14 after the first trade on the specific account, subject to eligibility; close all positions and pending orders. Review usually 1-2 business days; payment usually 1-2 business days after invoice approval. Futures Sim-Funded: every 4 days on Growth (50% withdrawable, cap $2,500 to $4,000), every 5 days on Pro (100% withdrawable, cap $5,000 to $8,000). Live Funded: daily, no cap
See all prop firm payouts →
Payout Frequency
Payout Cap
Payout Eligibility
Withdrawable Amount
Key ElementOFP FundingFTMO
StrengthsInstant funding, No evaluation, Configurable daily loss limits, Up to 95% profit split, Wide platform selection, 4-day first payout, Scale to $5MFull fee refund on 2-Step; static drawdown; no consistency rules on CFD; zero withdrawal commission; scaling to $2M; futures line with no minimum trading days and no activation fee
Weaknesses20% inconsistency score rule causes majority of denials, Trustpilot 3.6/5 with 23%+ one-star reviews, Widespread payout denial complaints1-Step fee non-refundable; 50% Best Day condition for passing/rewards; new 1-Step account after reward starts with a 90%-of-initial-capital loss floor; futures is a recurring monthly subscription, Growth pays out only 50% per request, and the Live Funded step is by invitation only
Best ForExperienced traders wanting immediate capital access without challenge phasesCFD: 2-Step for most, 1-Step only if the 90% split outweighs other concerns. Futures: Pro if you want 100% withdrawals, Growth if you want the cheapest entry

Conclusion and Final Recommendation

Choose OFP Funding โ€“ Firm Review if you want a higher profit split, up to 95%, a shorter evaluation at 0 phase and news trading allowed. Consider FTMO if you want a choice of 1-Step or 2-Step evaluations and MT4, MT5, cTrader or TradingView. Its Free Trials let you practise before buying. Neither firm is better in the abstract. The right choice depends on your strategy, your budget and the instruments you trade, so read both full reviews before you commit. Verify current rules and pricing on each firmโ€™s own site before purchasing.

Frequently asked questions

How We Compared OFP Funding and FTMO

Both firms carry a JoinProp Rating out of 10, scored on the same nine weighted factors, led by payout reliability at 20%, then fee structure, drawdown rules and profit split at 15% each. The scores come from our own firm reviews, built from each firmโ€™s current terms rather than its marketing pages and re-checked at least every 90 days. Affiliate relationships have no effect on any rating, and ratings are never sold. The tables above are the evidence behind those scores. Read our full ranking methodology.

View More Elite Prop Firms Compared: The5ers vs FTMO

JoinProp FTMO product scope: FTMO runs two product lines. The rules and reward terms discussed on this page are its CFD 1-Step and 2-Step programs, while the pricing table also lists its Futures Growth and Pro plans, which are sold on a monthly subscription and carry their own risk limits and payout terms. Both lines are covered in full in our FTMO review.