Maven Trading vs Funded Trading Plus – Elite Prop Firms Comparison
Introduction
Maven and fundedtradingplus have established themselves as competitive players in the proprietary trading firm space, offering traders the opportunity to access funded accounts after passing evaluation challenges. Maven is recognized for its innovative two-tier evaluation process and transparent profit splits, earning a solid 4.3/5 on Trustpilot from over 200 reviews. Meanwhile, fundedtradingplus stands out with its diverse account sizes and more relaxed trading parameters, garnering a respectable 3.9/5 Trustpilot rating from over 150 reviews. Both firms aim to provide retail traders with institutional capital, though they differ significantly in their approach to evaluation and trader support.
| Quick Comparison |
| Feature |
Maven |
fundedtradingplus |
|
 |
 |
| Founded |
2022 |
2021 |
| Trustpilot Rating |
3.3/5 (200+ reviews) |
4.2/5 (150+ reviews) |
| Account Sizes |
$10,000 to $200,000 |
$5,000 to $400,000 |
| Profit Split |
Up to a competitive 90% |
Up to 80% |
| Evaluation Type |
Two-phase Challenge |
One-phase Express & Two-phase Standard |
| Review |
Read full review |
Read full review |
| Program Types – Which experience fits your goals? |
| Program |
Maven |
fundedtradingplus |
| Two-Phase Challenge |
Maven Evaluation: Challenge Phase and Verification Phase with realistic profit targets |
Standard Evaluation: Two phases with daily drawdown limits and profit targets |
| Express/One-Phase |
Not offered |
Express Evaluation: Single phase with higher fee but faster funding |
| Evaluation Duration |
No time limits on phases |
No time limit for completion |
| Scaling Plan |
Account size can double after consistent performance |
Account scaling up to 4x the initial size based on performance milestones |
| Demo Account |
Free trial available for testing platform |
Demo account available to test platform before purchase |
| Assessment Criteria – How can you pass the test? |
| Criteria |
Maven |
fundedtradingplus |
| Profit Target (Phase 1) |
8% on Challenge Phase |
10% on Standard Evaluation Phase 1 |
| Profit Target (Phase 2) |
5% on Verification Phase |
5% on Standard Evaluation Phase 2 |
| Daily Drawdown Limit |
4% of account balance |
5% of account balance |
| Maximum Drawdown |
8% of starting balance |
10% of initial account balance |
| Minimum Trading Days |
5 trading days per phase |
7 trading days in Express, 5 in each Standard phase |
| Holding Overnight |
Allowed with restrictions |
Allowed with position size limitations |
| News Trading |
Permitted with caution |
Allowed but not recommended during high-impact events |
| Fees and Pricing – How much will you pay? |
| Option |
Maven |
fundedtradingplus |
| $10,000 Account |
$99 |
$95 (Standard), $199 (Express) |
| $25,000 Account |
$199 |
$209 (Standard), $349 (Express) |
| $50,000 Account |
$299 |
$310 (Standard), $499 (Express) |
| $100,000 Account |
$499 |
$550 (Standard), $799 (Express) |
| $200,000 Account |
$999 |
$950 (Standard), $1,399 (Express) |
| Reset Fee |
50% of initial fee |
70% of initial fee |
| Coupons |
Coupon Code |
Coupon Code |
| Review |
Read full review |
Read full review |
| Platforms/Tools – What can you use? |
| Feature |
Maven |
fundedtradingplus |
| Trading Platforms |
MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 |
MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView |
| Mobile Trading |
Supported via MT4/MT5 mobile apps |
Supported across all platforms |
| Dashboard |
Clean, responsive trader dashboard with metrics |
Comprehensive analytics dashboard with real-time updates |
| Performance Analytics |
Detailed statistics and performance tracking |
Advanced trade analytics with visual representations |
| Educational Resources |
Basic educational materials and webinars |
Extensive library of tutorials, guides, and strategy resources |
| API Access |
Limited API functionality |
Available for advanced traders |
| Available Markets – What can you trade? |
| Market |
Maven |
fundedtradingplus |
| Forex |
28+ currency pairs |
40+ currency pairs |
| Commodities |
Gold, silver, oil, and more |
Comprehensive range including metals, energy, and agricultural |
| Indices |
Major global indices |
Wide selection of global indices |
| Stocks/Equities |
Limited selection |
Extensive selection of US and global stocks |
| Cryptocurrencies |
Major cryptos as CFDs |
Wide range of cryptocurrency CFDs |
| Trading Hours |
Standard market hours with some extended sessions |
Extended hours available for certain markets |
| Technical Capabilities/Performance |
| Feature |
Maven |
fundedtradingplus |
| Execution Speed |
Average latency of 50-100ms |
Low latency (30-80ms) with premium servers |
| Server Locations |
NY4, LD4 server options |
Multiple global locations for reduced latency |
| Slippage |
Minimal under normal market conditions |
Very low with advanced order routing |
| Spreads |
Industry standard spreads |
Competitive spreads, especially on major pairs |
| Maximum Leverage |
1:100 during evaluation, 1:20 for funded accounts |
1:100 during evaluation, 1:30 for funded accounts |
| EA/Algo Trading |
Supported with restrictions |
Fully supported with dedicated resources |
| Support & Community |
| Feature |
Maven |
fundedtradingplus |
| Customer Support |
Email and ticket-based support, response within 24 hours |
24/5 live chat, email, and dedicated account managers |
| Community |
Active Discord community |
Online forum and Telegram group |
| Educational Webinars |
Weekly webinars with trading experts |
Bi-weekly sessions and recorded archives |
| Knowledge Base |
Basic FAQ and guides |
Extensive documentation and video tutorials |
| Language Support |
English, Spanish |
English, Spanish, German, French |
| Conclusion and Final Recommendation |
| Key Element |
Maven |
fundedtradingplus |
| Strengths |
High profit split (up to 90%), reasonable evaluation parameters, no time limits, solid trading infrastructure |
Diverse program options, flexible one-phase Express route, wider market selection, robust educational resources |
| Weaknesses |
More limited market selection, fewer account size options, basic educational resources |
Lower profit split percentages, higher reset fees, slightly more stringent profit targets |
| Best For |
Traders seeking higher profit splits and reasonable evaluation parameters with straightforward requirements |
Versatile traders who value choice between fast-track or standard evaluations and need extensive market access |
| Final Grade |
3.2/5 |
4.4/5 |
| Discount Codes |
Coupon Code |
Coupon Code |
| Review |
Read full review |
Read full review |
FAQ
What makes Maven popular among users?
Maven has gained popularity primarily for its high profit-split percentages (up to 90%) and its user-friendly evaluation process with reasonable profit targets. Traders appreciate the absence of time limits during the evaluation phases, which reduces pressure and allows for a more natural trading approach. The simplified two-phase structure with clear rules and metrics also contributes to its growing reputation among funded trading programs.
How does fundedtradingplus differ from other similar organizations?
Fundedtradingplus stands out for its flexible program options, particularly the Express Evaluation that allows traders to skip directly to funding after a single phase (albeit with a higher entry fee). They also offer an exceptionally wide range of tradable markets including extensive stock options and cryptocurrencies. Their scaling program is particularly attractive, allowing accounts to grow up to 4x their initial size based on performance, which is more generous than many competitors.
Which firm offers better value for beginners?
For absolute beginners, Maven might offer better value due to its straightforward evaluation structure, more lenient profit targets in the first phase (8% vs. fundedtradingplus’s 10%), and lower reset fees if you fail the challenge. However, fundedtradingplus provides more extensive educational resources and a more comprehensive knowledge base that could benefit newcomers to trading. The choice ultimately depends on whether a beginner values simplicity (Maven) or educational support (fundedtradingplus).
Can I trade using automated strategies with either firm?
Both firms allow automated trading strategies and Expert Advisors (EAs), but with some differences. Maven permits EAs with certain restrictions and monitoring to ensure they align with their risk parameters. Fundedtradingplus offers more robust support for algorithmic trading, including dedicated resources and guides specifically for EA users. If automated trading is central to your strategy, fundedtradingplus might offer more comprehensive support for this approach.
Which firm offers better scaling opportunities?
Fundedtradingplus provides more extensive scaling opportunities, with the potential to grow accounts up to 4x the initial size based on meeting performance milestones. Their scaling program is more clearly defined with specific metrics. Maven offers account doubling after consistent performance but has a somewhat more conservative scaling approach. For traders focused on long-term growth and scaling their account sizes significantly, fundedtradingplus appears to offer the more attractive path.
How was this 2 companies Comparison Created?
1. We Collect
Our comparison begins with comprehensive data collection from multiple authoritative sources. We analyze the official websites of Maven and fundedtradingplus to gather current information on their programs, fee structures, and technical specifications. We supplement this with hundreds of verified customer reviews from Trustpilot and other review platforms. Additionally, we consult industry publications, trading forums, and conduct interviews with current and former traders from both firms to gain insights into the actual user experience beyond marketing claims.
2. We Examine
The collected information undergoes rigorous verification and analysis by our team of trading experts, many of whom have personal experience with funded account programs. We cross-reference all claims against multiple sources to ensure accuracy. Our experts test both platforms where possible, examining factors such as execution speed, platform stability, and support responsiveness. We pay particular attention to the consistency between advertised features and actual trader experiences to identify any potential discrepancies.
3. We Score
Our scoring methodology employs a weighted evaluation system across multiple categories including program structure, pricing, platform performance, market access, support quality, and profit-sharing terms. Each category is assessed on a scale of 1-5 based on objective criteria defined by industry standards and competitive benchmarks. We give additional weight to factors that most directly impact trader success, such as evaluation parameters, profit targets, and drawdown rules. The final scores represent a balanced assessment of each firm’s overall offering relative to industry standards and direct competitors.
4. You Choose
This comparison is designed to serve as an informative guide rather than a definitive judgment. We recommend focusing on the specific aspects that align with your personal trading style, experience level, and financial goals. Consider whether you prioritize higher profit splits (Maven) or program flexibility (fundedtradingplus). Evaluate which evaluation structure better matches your trading approach and risk tolerance. Remember that the “best” choice varies based on individual circumstances—experienced scalpers may prefer different features than swing traders or algorithmic strategists.
View More Elite Prop Firms Compared: The Trading Pit vs The5ers
